Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Observations From Experience...

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,480Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10463 Posts
 Posted 09/20/2011  12:02 pm Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Earlier this year, I opened and went through a bag of 1963 Canadian silver dollars (1000 coins). The bag was canvas, and likely original. I suspect it had been moved occasionally because the coins were excessively "baggy".

Some observations:

- not a single coin graded nicer than MS-63. This should put in perspective the concept of 'grade-rarity' on heavy, large denomination coins. This mirrors my observations of opening a nickel dollar mint bag as well last year. I think in the long term, MS-64 and MS-65 silver and nickel dollars will be decent investments (except those that were available in rolls, e.g., 1939, 1949, 1982, etc.).

- the better coins were toned coins. The coins that toned were ones in contact with the outside of the mint bag, and therefore not in contact with each other. Many collectors think toning hides defects, but probably some of the finest coins were toned, and then dipped (properly) to show how pristine they were. Learning how to grade toned coins is difficult, but essential for collectors of mint state coins.

- lastly, trust your own eyes. If it is in a TPG holder, that merely reflects an other's opinion. Just because it is a TPG holder, or in a book, or on the internet, does not mean it is 100% correct.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Edited by SPP-Ottawa
09/20/2011 1:54 pm
Pillar of the Community
littlemoney's Avatar
Canada
902 Posts
 Posted 09/20/2011  1:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add littlemoney to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
with you 100% on grading & TPG's SPP-Ottawa
New Member
Canada
48 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2011  8:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismateer to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Totally agree Rog, however , I trust ICCS (and to a degree PCGS) more than any seller.
We mustn't forget these TGP'ers see WAY more coins for comparison than any of us
do, except for maybe some roll searchers, but every they would be limited as to types they see.
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10463 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2011  10:40 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Jamie, I certainly fit under the category of mint state roll (and mint bag) searcher. I look at a LOT of coins... My trust for ICCS has dropped considerably in the past two years, I won't go into details, but there are lots of threads here that certainly highlight the low points. I am tempted to conduct an experiment, whereby I cut out my MS-65 coins in older ICCS holders and ask a dealer (who is a big client of ICCS) to resubmit them for me. The results might be fun, but I think predictable.

PCGS is slowly gaining more of my trust, with the newer graded coins/slabs. Last year, I finally put my business strike nickel dollar registry set into PCGS holders - was it worth it? I'll never know, because it will be my kids selling those coins, not me. Frankly, I am happy, because ICCS and CCCS soft flips are simply not designed to safely protect heavy, large denomination coins, the mylar inserts crack with the first drop.

Lastly, at least with my own experience, CCCS is all over the map. Sometimes CCCS is remarkably consistent and conservative, other times I wonder if CCCS is merely taking the word of other TPG holders when submitted slabbed coins, and sometimes I am left scratching my head with the inconsistency of the comments - this is especially true in the past 6 months...

In the end, it is the coin with the best eye-appeal that ends up in my collection, especially with small cents. I would rather take a full (>95%) red MS-65 strike than a MS-66 coin that ICCS calls red (despite being 75-80% red). For George VI and Elizabeth II business strikes, a strong cameo in MS-65 is more appealing than a MS-66. I trust my eyes, and I buy a coin that makes me say, 'that is gorgeous' or 'that is every bit of MS-65 (and more)' rather than the grade on the certificate.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Edited by SPP-Ottawa
09/21/2011 10:42 pm
New Member
Canada
48 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2011  11:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismateer to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well stated SPP, however I I've said in the past, fear mongering toward all slabbed coins is counter productive.
Having said that, I have noticed a bit of a slip as well with ICCS.

A prominent dealer a few years ago stated that ICCS was grading modern nickel coinage "wrong" ie: too conservatively.
To be graded MS65, the coin had to be virtually mark free, with at least standard luster.
Recently I've seen MS66s that look poorer.
Maybe that statement finally pressured ICCS to slacken.
although I should mention, I replaced some nickel MS65s with MS66s that were definately better, so I haven't lost all faith.

I've heard other strange stories of PCGS too, like they won't assign a grade higher than has been assigned already for a given date, no matter how good the coin is.
Also, they can have "periods" of dramatic strictness.
I do however, like their strictness toward cleaned and fake toned coins.
Edited by numismateer
09/22/2011 11:36 am
Valued Member
kitkat1858's Avatar
Canada
371 Posts
 Posted 09/22/2011  8:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kitkat1858 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
numismateer,

Where did you hear that PCGS won't assign grades higher than have already be assigned for the date? I have a very hard time believing that.
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,480Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to rattle this change. Forums