The more I look at small date vs large date, the more similar they look to me....I'm calling upon you experts to end my headache and tell me which one this is.
The upper part of the 6 on a SD doesn't stretch far enough to make a straight line up and down to the outside of the loop. The top of the 9 on a SD is level with the top of the 1, while in the LD it goes slightly higher.
A couple other points - the large date has a very round 0, while the small date is more of a vertical ellipse. Also, the large date 1 is tapered, and very rectangular on the small date. Side by side they're more obvious (there is an overall size difference).
Upon further inspection and after reading the other posts, I think I was wrong the first time, I think it is a large date. Still not sure though. Whilst I agree with the points made by previous posters, the 6 just looks really short for a large date. Must be the picture.
It is definitely a large date. I have been working with the small dates extensively for the last 4 or 5 months, trying to figure what the mint did and why the changed from the small date to the large date in that year. There is much more to tis stroy than meets the eye.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use