Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Grading Of Coins Is An Unregulated Practice

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 24 / Views: 5,465Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
mishap-coins's Avatar
United States
344 Posts
 Posted 12/25/2006  10:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mishap-coins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
BY THE WAY

MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL !





This law article kinda sounds like it encases some sellers on ebay.


Seems anyone that believes they were duped by some of these TPGs should go to one of the government agencies and report it. THe more that report it the quicker it will get more attention.

When those slabbing companies label ms70s by the thousands do they fall under the law #1341 below ?


1341. Frauds and swindles.

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

[Codified to 18 U.S.C. 1341]

{{12-31-02 p.8298}}

Valued Member
mishap-coins's Avatar
United States
344 Posts
 Posted 12/25/2006  10:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mishap-coins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Originally posted by Five4fighting

In regards to regulating TPG's Since it would be a Federal thing what would it fall under? A new Goverment agency in the Federal Trade Commission? As far as I understand right now just the ANA endorses a TPG and I think NGC is the only one endorse by ANA. (If I'm wrong here please correct me)
I really feel bad for new collectors or uninformed ones and see a coin graded by a TPG and take's it by what that company graded it.




Here is the link to the FTC in which they recommend ANA, PNG, ICTA & BBB for HELP. So the FTC does kinda endorses those agencies for coins.

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs...coinalrt.htm
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 01/27/2007  6:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
As far as I understand right now just the ANA endorses a TPG and I think NGC is the only one endorse by ANA. (If I'm wrong here please correct me)

ANA recognizes or endorses one firm as the official grading firm of the ANA. But that endorsement is sold to whatever grading firm ponies up the sweetest deal in cash and other goodies such as free gradings (mainly cash.) No other qualifications. Currently NGC has the endosement but it expires this year. Right now the ANA is working on a new program which will allow them to endorse several firms if they meet certain standards. But there has been no clarification as to what these standards will be, and many think it will boil down to whoever gives them enough cash over a set amount will get an ANA endorsement.
Valued Member
mishap-coins's Avatar
United States
344 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2007  09:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mishap-coins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Condor,

There again the no regulations in this market raises its nasty skull. Like you said which can make a layman persume it is tainted. In my opinion ANA should be free of bribery in which it sounds like your refering to. Any time someone holds purse strings over another it is like a noose. ANA to subject themselves to a married relationship for a signed length of time is wrong as we all know any day anything can change. Besides which in my opinion ANA should only allow its self to endorse a slab company by the peoples vote quarterly and not by perks and assignments of money. Let the people vote.
Rest in Peace
Morgan Fred's Avatar
United States
2684 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2007  9:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgan Fred to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree, MC. I also think the ANA should be a little more sensitive and responsive to us little people in numismatics and listen a little harder to us instead of to the big dealers. I'm an ANA member and I've noticed in the on-going Board elections that the issues revolve more around minor election rules and other constitution changes instead of discussion of those grassroot issues which affect most of us such as fraud in the online market place and, of course the issue of endorsement of TPGs.

As some know, I am very active in an organization which, for almost 100 years has been VERY responsive to its membership and is VERY sensitive to its position and reputation in the US and the world: Boy Scouts of America. BSA is chartered by Congress, has official representation down to the community level. While there's no way the ANA is large enough to have this degree of outreach, it still needs to recognize that it is the only organization which represents ALL numismatists whether they are ANA members or not.

Fred
Valued Member
mishap-coins's Avatar
United States
344 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2007  11:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mishap-coins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MF I agree and it starts to appear that with all the money involved by the Multi-marketers that it appears that most of them on the board could be subjected to pressures outside. Some like the sound of saying they are a long time member of ANA and so forth to make them appear they are trustworthy. Some I believe don't deserve to use the emblem. I imagine ANA could put someone on full time just finding those that use the emblem without being a member or like some that don't abide by the rules.

Makes it a Whipty Do when no one hears the little guy.

Like the tree that falls in the forest with out anyone around. Who hears it? No One !

Multi-marketing fraud is ramped and when you view the cases it seems that, the more times than not they pay a fine and a short probation or jail for the big fellows and the smaller marketers get double that. Seems its alot less given back than was stolen. Besides which they just agree to settle out of court with a redress fund and probation and off they go to try a new borderline tactic. No jail time

Maybe all the numismatists need to realize that just like ANA started some where so can another similar type membership can start and another and another just as what is happening with the slabbing companies. It would probably disrupt the system just as the weekend warrior slabber has done to the grading service..

Maybe they should use the Boy Scouts of America blueprint to go forward. Maybe they won't because the Boy Scouts blueprint is more trustworthy , I don't know ?
Valued Member
Berry's Avatar
United States
394 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2007  4:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Berry to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would like to put some thoughts out about possible ramifications to the TPG "industry" if some sort of government controls were promulgated and enforced.


I do not know the current security systems that the ANACS, NGC OR PCGS uses, if any. I will not address any of the other grading companies or boiler rooms that are used to put out slabbed coins.

A big concern has always been about switching or missing coins that were sent in for grading. I would "guesstimate" that all areas of work are under surveillance 24/7. Furthermore, they must take some minimal security measures that most people would not be privy to. This could be effective for controlling their workforce and insuring that no petty (or major) theft is occurring. However, I would imagine for the sake of the bottom line, that expenses and costs are held to a minimum. (Need to pay the endorsements that we have read about.)

Now bring in the FEDS and their regulations. Some things that would occur would be:
1. Quadruple the amount of paperwork with reports having to be sent to regulators and/or made available on-site for the regulators to conduct no-notice inspections or even a scheduled annual or semi-annual inspection. (BIG COST)
2. Upgrade all facilities to a level that will meet governing directives for that industry. (IMMENSE COST)
3. Almost automatically, they will have to institute some basic requirements for their staff. Will have to complete work and family histories prior to being hired. Will be required to be bonded.. Will have to wear special (pocket-less) clothing in coin grading areas. Must pass through metal detectors when entering or leaving sensitive areas containing coins. Will be required to submit to search and seizure rules, et al. (WOULD BE MONETARY COST AND POSSIBLY NOT GETTING THE BEST QUALIFIED GRADERS)

The cost for having coins "slabbed" for any reason, good or bad, will probably double and then those advocating Federal Control will scream that the cost of having coins graded is atrocious.

These are just a few things that could happen if any type of government control was to be implemented. It is just a quickie off the top of my head thing and I have not studied it nor have I done any research into this problem.

Berry







Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2007  08:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Now bring in the FEDS and their regulations. Some things that would occur would be:
1. Quadruple the amount of paperwork with reports having to be sent to regulators and/or made available on-site for the regulators to conduct no-notice inspections or even a scheduled annual or semi-annual inspection. (BIG COST)
2. Upgrade all facilities to a level that will meet governing directives for that industry. (IMMENSE COST)
3. Almost automatically, they will have to institute some basic requirements for their staff. Will have to complete work and family histories prior to being hired. Will be required to be bonded.. Will have to wear special (pocket-less) clothing in coin grading areas. Must pass through metal detectors when entering or leaving sensitive areas containing coins. Will be required to submit to search and seizure rules, et al. (WOULD BE MONETARY COST AND POSSIBLY NOT GETTING THE BEST QUALIFIED GRADERS)


And of course don't forget the delay in getting the program started while the government writes an official set of grading standards for each coin type (Book of regulations and guides 800 pages thick, all text, no images. "A MS-65 Morgan dollar will show no evidence of wear, friction, rub, or abrasion. Luster must rate no lower than 75, see USNBS regulation 342.74 sec a (i). A total of no more than 22 contact marks are allowed with marks in the field counted as a single mark, marks on the cheek as two marks each, and marks in the protected areas as .5 marks. Total sum lengths of the marks shall not exceed 1.64 inches." ) or they may decide instead to make the official standards very broad ("A MS-65 shall have no signs of wear and be visually superior to a 64 but less than a 66."). And of course there will have to be a date on all the slabs because being government regulations they will be subject to annual revision which means that this years standards are different from last years which are different from the year before. The regulations will also be open to selective revision due to lobbying efforts (CC dollars were transported more and further so they should be allowed a total of 35 marks for a MS-65.) And of course each service will have to keep a full set of each years regulations on hand so if a coin is sent back in for a question of grading accuracy they can check the date on the slab and compare the grade to the standards in effect during that year. You couldn't compare a 2008 graded slab with a 2011 slab because they had different official grading standards. A 2008 could be a 65, or a 66 under 2009 standards, 67 in 2010, but because of a change in the market resulted in intense lobbying a 64 by 2011 standards and all would be correct.

And of course since there are now official government standards, no coin would be allowed to be sold with a grade stated unless it is in an official government approved TPG slab. All raw coins must be sold with no opinions of grade stated.
Rest in Peace
Morgan Fred's Avatar
United States
2684 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2007  1:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgan Fred to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Conder, you forgot to mention the 2000 Federal Inspectors which would need to be hired and trained to ensure the TPGs are in conformance with the regulations.

I presume you've worked with, for, and/or against the Feds in earlier times. We're overdue for another Revolution.
  Previous TopicReplies: 24 / Views: 5,465Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 1.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums