Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

New Liberty Dollar

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 3,820Next Topic Page 2 of 2
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2013  9:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SteveCaruso to your friends list
Here we go again...

I am all for using bullion for purchases. Completely. But this is simply going to be a repeat. :-(

They should alter the coin's appearance enough to make it hard to make a counterfeit case. Make them 11-sided, or use a classical motif of liberty that doesn't look like the old coins or what's already been put on classical coinage. A big old silver round is a magnificent canvas to work with.

Here I can't just help but think that this "NLD" thing is just jumping on the bandwagon to try and pick up where NORFED left off for the sake of personal gain, rather than the principle.

I also find the whole "inflation proof" thing kinda silly, especially with how volatile the precious metals market still is. They could be challenged on that.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10047 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2013  11:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Earle42 to your friends list

Quote:
Just curious, why would anyone buy these over ASE (or any other coin)?


When I bought mine Obama had just been ushered into office. History proved it was a no brainer the economy would tank big time, so I knew I people would want PMs and they were going to go up - just common sense.

In the area I live, there is an indoor farmers' market that, at that time, had a machine for dispensing Liberty dollars. This is how I learned of the NORFEDs.

Seeing the prices previous NORFEDs were already bringing (from a numismatic point of view) I did not see how NORFED rounds would decrease in value even if D.C. became pro-American at some point in the future.

Sure enough, NORFEDS still bring higher premiums if sold where collectors can get them. Even the ones I had are selling now for around 45.00 - 48.00 each. While the ASEs are nowhere near this. In the future, I see these as being similar in collectability to other private issued currencies that became popular in their own day.

BTW - I love ASEs!

At the time I was not fully aware of the "political" aspect of them. But as I looked into them more (after I had bought some instead of ASEs), I found myself liking someone's PM based specie idea had taken off.

@Steve:
You may be correct on the Feds being able to get these guys on technicalities of syntax. But from what I understood at the time, NORFED was saying "inflation proof" in terms of a silver dime can still buy, in today's world, the same amount of goods it did in the 60s (maybe a little more). In this way silver backed money is "inflation proof." Its value is not determined by a bunch of bureaucrats who have given themselves an unlimited ability to make as much "money" as they want (since its based on nothing).

Yes, you are correct in that the market bounces up and down, but I think (note that word) that pretty much a silver coin has retained its buying power while the dollar has sunk.

Currently there are many areas where our Constitutional rights are being assaulted. When reading everything I could on the trial - from both sides - the main problem I had with the case against Nathaus is that the FBI's position would allow the government the power to to tell people what they could and could not take as payment for a service/product. Also, the FBI's argument manipulated the data in their favor by showing the large, OZ coins next to an enlarged picture of a Mercury dime in an effort to show how much the NORFED stuff "looked like" US coinage. To me this was deceptive - sort of a white lie.

I aslo agree with you that the new people could make their stuff 12 sided or something would totally erase the ridiculous "counterfeit" idea.

Although I think a 3rd grader can tell the differences of the orginal NORFED oz.s and a real coin easy enough.

Another thing that really bothers me is that by definition a counterfeit is something meant to deceive a person into taking something of lesser value for payment. I find it very interesting that the original NORFED rounds could be called counterfeit from the standpoint that even if someone mistook one for the only coin that vaguely resembles them in size - a Peace dollar - since the NORFED is 1 ounce - it is actually worth more in melt that the Peace dollar! The person would be getting something worth MORE than what they thought it they were. I am sure there is a reason Henning did not make his nickels out o silver!


Quote:
Here I can't just help but think that this "NLD" thing is just jumping on the bandwagon to try and pick up where NORFED left off for the sake of personal gain, rather than the principle.


This may be. But I also have to wonder if the newbies are not just taking the design since it already has such a widespread usage as compared to any other barter currency made? I think the fact that NORFED rounds became so popular (something like 6 million being used at the peak) was the reason the Feds nailed NatHaus, and why the Fed wants to wipe out anything having to do with them from the public eye (such as telling ebay they cannot allow auctions containing NORFED rounds).

How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
Valued Member
United States
280 Posts
 Posted 03/10/2013  12:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jlgaudlitz95 to your friends list
Hmm, the "inflation proof" idea sounds similar to something someone made up a while back. Let me look into it.
Valued Member
United States
280 Posts
 Posted 03/10/2013  12:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jlgaudlitz95 to your friends list
Aha, found it! SteveCaruso had an idea about a year ago on putting silver coins back into circulation with "HardCash" cards worth their weight in silver at current prices. You can find this discussion at https://goccf.com/t/127885
Valued Member
United States
493 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  12:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add everything to your friends list
The government does not like these because they could promote taxless transactions, they want your money spent electronically for taxation. I love the NORFED, but they are simply anti-government establishment.
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  1:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Arcticsparky to your friends list
less government=more freedom
big government= less freedom
Thomas Jefferson said " A Government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have."
Precious metals are real money. They have not ever lost their value. Right now we are looking at their value in relationship to a manipulated lie called fiat currency. It's no wonder that value is so volatile. Just like any lie it grows and they have to keep making more. We all know what happens to lies in the end. Keep saving your real money,I say. Let them keep printing the lies. Hold on to your principles. We can make this country strong again. Soon people will be looking for real leaders, and principled men can step into the vacuum.
Edited by Arcticsparky
03/14/2013 1:35 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  4:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SteveCaruso to your friends list

Quote:
I think (note that word) that pretty much a silver coin has retained its buying power while the dollar has sunk.


Largely this is correct. Where there have been bumps up and down, but on average it has roughly stayed in step with inflation. Currently, it's in a little bit of a peak that happened with the crash and recession, but as it's falling slowly over the past few months I think the market is adjusting back down where it "should" be vis a vis the CPI.

It can sometimes be hard to track as different goods and services have changed in value relative to each other.


Quote:
Also, the FBI's argument manipulated the data in their favor by showing the large, OZ coins next to an enlarged picture of a Mercury dime in an effort to show how much the NORFED stuff "looked like" US coinage. To me this was deceptive - sort of a white lie.


Aye, those photos you posted a while back without size reference were a joke. It wasn't just a white lie in that case, it was trickery.

This is why I think that the NLD folks should "take a hint" and go out of their way to make sure there isn't "confusion" in that sort of worst-case-scenario before a jury.


Quote:
Aha, found it! SteveCaruso had an idea about a year ago on putting silver coins back into circulation with "HardCash" cards worth their weight in silver at current prices. You can find this discussion at https://goccf.com/t/127885


Yep, as I said, I'm all for using bullion for purchases. :-)


Quote:
Thomas Jefferson said " A Government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have."


Er, that quote didn't come from Jefferson, my friend: http://www.monticello.org/site/jeff...antquotation


Quote:
It's no wonder that value is so volatile.


Well, silver like any commodity can have its price easily manipulated regardless of the medium of exchange. Not many people want to remember Silver Thursday. That had little to do with fiat currency and more to do with greed.
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  5:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Arcticsparky to your friends list

Quote:
Er, that quote didn't come from Jefferson, my friend: http://www.monticello.org/site/jeff...antquotation

Regardless of who said it, It is true. You can quote me on that. People can manipulate anything including silver. That does not change the fact that the federal reserve is creating currency out of nothing, backed by nothing but lies and promises, and inflating exponentially. It simply factually cannot and will not last. My point is that silver will still be valuable when our dollar is worth nothing.
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  6:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list

Quote:
That does not change the fact that the federal reserve is creating currency out of nothing, backed by nothing but lies and promises, and inflating exponentially.


Thats basically the definition of money. Money is only valuable because people say so which has been true since the start of time.

Dont get me wrong I'm not a supporter of current economic policy, the QE is fine in small doses though. The problem is that theyres no plan to end the current practices which is where it becomes dangerous.

One day our money will be worth nothing, no government lasts forever, but that day wont be tomorrow or in the next few years barring something huge happening.

The next two presidential elections will determine how grim the future is for the US dollar. If one of them gets serious about improving it it can be turned around. The ironic part is you dont want the dollar to be too strong or else no one will buy anything we produce.
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  6:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Arcticsparky to your friends list
I would rather stick with money that has retained it's value since ancient Egypt. What I gave before was the definition for fiat currency not money. There's a big difference in staying power there. Fiat currencies always fail over and over again. Precious metals however, have not, since we began to record history. That's a good enough track record for me.
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  6:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list
Fiat and money are the same thing. The fiat isn't what has failed its the governments that have. Silver and gold are backed by the exact same principle in the sense that they have value because people say so. Its been inflated as well if you track it back to when it was first used as money. Just look at how small most Roman coins are compared to what the size of modern 90 percent silver coins were when they were used.

I like PMs as much as the next guy but they arent bulletproof either. At some point well expand into the universe or be able to mine asteroids/planets and it very well could be that its found to be so abundant that its viewed like aluminum is now. Better mining techniques open up more and more sources as well. From a strictly economic standpoint barring something like a civil war we arent at the point where our money falling apart is a concern in this lifetime especially for older generations. That doesn't mean were living in a time of prosperity or that were even employing smart economic policies, but its just not at that dire point yet. It will be one day if nothing changes though

Theres advantages and disadvantages to both systems of money. But both are only as good as the governments that control them. PM currencies has collapsed throughout history as well
Edited by basebal21
03/14/2013 6:39 pm
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  6:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Arcticsparky to your friends list
When have PM's failed as money? I have never heard of this. Unless they are outlawed for use as money by Governments to be replaced by fiat currency. Fiat means by command. Governments are creating currency by command, backed by nothing. PM's are intrinsically valuable to humans backed by themselves in and of themselves. I completely agree that with some responsible leadership, we can get our economy under control. Our fiat currency will still inflate though. Just in my lifetime I have seen it's value drop significantly, and they didn't print anywhere near as much as they are today.
Edited by Arcticsparky
03/14/2013 6:51 pm
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2013  7:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list
Theyve failed in a slightly different way but under the same conditions. When the government spends more than it has with PMs it either goes bankrupt or starts decreasing the PM content and quality of the money with weve seen towards the end of governments in the past. Or they just cant pay people anymore and theres a revolution or someone who can steps in. Its not the Zimbabwe hyperinflation but its still a failed currency. The common theme throughout is a government that gets to big and collapses under its own wight. I do agree the biggest advantage to PMs is that if it does collapse you still have the silver to remake into something else, but the whole idea is never to get to that point and Fiat does give you more wiggle room to correct yourself before the end.

Inflation itself isn't a bad thing as long as its natural. No one wants to work for 10 20 years and make what they made on day 1 even if its the same position and things like raises ect drive up prices and overtime you will always have some inflation. We are speeding up it up with printing which I agree isn't a good thing, but in the grand scheme of things some QE every now and then wont do a whole lot. The problem really is that you cant just do it all the time and there needs to be an end in sight which we need to correct for sure.

Our issues are necessarily whats being done but more how its being done. If we said were going to do some QE 3 times over the next 4 years to buy us some time to correct the issues while we work on them then thats it and we actually did address the root problem no one would bat an eye or really see an effect. Still waiting on that plan and the appearance that were just going to keep doing that forever whenever we want too because we dont want to address the causes creates a lot of uncertainty which is most dangerous thing of all for the economy. People sit on money instead of growing their businesses during those times and you bring everything to a crawl.

Just so I dont give the wrong impression I do agree with you about the economics of today, we can survive the storm for a while but it cant go on forever.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2805 Posts
 Posted 03/23/2013  10:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nalaberong to your friends list
I have a hard time getting behind these weird rounds made just to fight the government. If I wanted to make an alternative precious metal currency I'd focus more on making the coins look nice, artistic and spendable than sticking as many Liberty/Freedom/etc. motifs as possible on the same coin.
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts
 Posted 03/24/2013  08:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinsKelly to your friends list
The problem with making them spendable is you will wind up in jail.
Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 3,820Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Forums