| Author |
Replies: 41 / Views: 5,812 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
883 Posts |
I am sorry but I will always stand up and vocalize for the FDR dime. This is primarily because of the advocacy of the march of dimes launched by him that resulted in the reclamation of not only enjoyment of summer for children in the USA but also helped fund research that has nearly eradicated polio on the planet. I was, thankfully, not affected by polio but I did live around those that were. I say continue with the obverse. I like Mercury dimes but, really, if you are that much in support of a Roman God of financial gain why not just put him on the $10 bill? I think that if you put your mind toward the significance of the March of Dimes you can appreciate that collection of Roosevelt dimes might have the added obligation of recognizing that you might want to consider donation to a worthy cause. If you don't want to collect them, then at least contribute them to a cause you are interested in. I am also biased because I share a common ancestor with FDR so there is that.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188770 Posts |
Well said, PlumCrazy814. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
I like the Roosevelt a great deal as a collectable. About 80% of the US population was born since its inception and more than 95% of collectors have grown up with the coin.
It has remained essentially unchanged other than the switch in materials, moving mint marks to the obverse and the introduction of the P and W mint marks. While the silvers were heavily collected even in BU and worn coins are mostly still with us the clads have not been very heavily saved, especially in choice condition. There are some very rare coins in the series from overmintmarks to proofs struck at the San Francisco mint without mintmarks. The mint even got caught failing to put a "P" on some of the 1982 dimes. Some neat varieties even show upin mint sets like the '69- D/D.
A complete set in chBU condition can be assembled for next to nothing and a Gem set can be done on a shoestring. Significant rarities exist in the series if you desire FB's or superb Gems. There are also a virtually complete set of PL's available with effort.
The series has never been verypopular even back in the silver days; people saved the coins much more than people collected them. This leaves open the near certainty that more varieties and rarities will be discovered.
It could be a while until enough interest exists to have much effect on prices but in the meantime you can pick up great coins for next to nothing.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
997 Posts |
As far as trying to collect the various things the US and RCM Mints produce I don't bother. For me, I define a "Coin" as a legal tender device intended to be used in every day commerce. The silver, gold, proofs, special sets, commemoratives and other stuff the mints produce I define as "Legal Tender Collector Items" (LTCI). For these reasons I consider my COIN collection complete for each year with a Mint Set and even that contains things that doesn't meet my strict definition (halves and US dollar coins) but I keep booking them to complete the series. I also don't consider varieties as separate issues and I consider my Lincoln Cent collection complete without the 55 DDO for example but I will try to find them when possible. I do buy some of these LTCI's from time to time but I don't get every one. I might pick up a Proof set here and there and I kind of like some of the RCM silver. The wife might look at something and buy it because she thinks it is pretty and I occasionally will pick up a bullion "coin" like an ASE. As far as the Roosevelt dime is concerned I consider my collection complete with no silver dated 65 or later and no proofs. It is probably the easiest to complete except perhaps the Jefferson nickel.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
452 Posts |
I too collected an unc set silver Roosevelt dimes in a Dansco. I may yet start collecting the clads. Quote:I like Mercury dimes but, really, if you are that much in support of a Roman God of financial gain why not just put him on the $10 bill? fyi Quote:Despite its tiny size, the "Mercury" dime may very well be the most beautiful coin ever produced by the United States Mint. It is truly remarkable that a coin this small could have such an intricate and aesthetically pleasing design. One thing its design does not depict, however, is Mercury, the messenger of the gods in Roman mythology. The portrait on its obverse is actually that of Liberty wearing a winged cap symbolizing freedom of thought. Thus, the coin more properly is known as the Winged Head Liberty dime. But the misnomer "Mercury" was applied to it early on and, after many years of common usage, has stuck. https://www.NGCcoin.com/coin-explor...945-pscid-31
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
883 Posts |
Quote: One thing its design does not depict, however, is Mercury, the messenger of the gods in Roman mythology. The portrait on its obverse is actually that of Liberty wearing a winged cap symbolizing freedom of thought. Thus, the coin more properly is known as the Winged Head Liberty dime. But the misnomer "Mercury" was applied to it early on and, after many years of common usage, has stuck.
Well - I've probably heard that many times before but still forget it. Thanks for reminding AES
|
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
Roosevelt dimes are my first collection passion. I have yet to get very invested in cents. I'm almost done with a mostly circulated Roosevelt collection, which will be my first finished set of any coin.
Edited by wadahek 09/30/2016 09:27 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
883 Posts |
Quote: I have yet to get very invested in cents. It takes a special passion to focus on cents in my opinion. I do have a collection of Lincolns, most of the early ones are culls or sliders, and I never had the resources to justify buying the key/scares ones. It was what I could afford at the time in the '60's and '70's from scanning pocket change for the most part. I find it interesting that Roosevelt dimes became your first collection passion Wadahek and would like to know why if you are willing to share. Impressed that are nearly complete with them. Are they in an album or flips or other?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
717 Posts |
I have a clad, circulated Roosevelt set completed by going through change. Only took a few months, as I had a jar of dimes kept over a 4 year period to go through. I am with Cladking, there are some real conditional rarities out there. I am currently trying to put together a full set of FT/FB Roosevelts, and there are a lot of years where the pickings are slim at best. Upside is that the costs are low compared to other sets, so I hope the set doesn't "wake up" before I get my set complete. I think I am about 20 percent finished now.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
997 Posts |
I put my 1965-2012 clad Roosevelts together from circulation over a span of a few weeks after I bought the book. Since then I fill the spots with broken up Mint Sets.
I also save the first coin found in circulation of each denomination each year, and as often as not it has been a dime.
|
|
New Member
United States
9 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
@PlumCrazy814 When I first started collecting last year, it was after finding some coins that I was gifted as a child. Most of these coins were Roosevelt dimes, Mercury dimes, Buffalo nickels, or Lincoln Cents. I don't know what it is about them, but Roosevelt dimes stood out to me as the most beautiful composition (I'm an artist/graphic designer so balance is very important to me). With my tight budget, I appreciate how consistent Roosevelt dimes are in price, and the lack of extreme rarities.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Apex - Great example, and -  to the CCF!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188770 Posts |
Very nice, ApexCollecting! 
|
|
New Member
United States
13 Posts |
A buddy of mine is huge in rosies and we trade 2 for 1 when I get S mints. Works for both of us.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 41 / Views: 5,812 |
Page 3 of 3
|