| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,014 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts |
Nice looking coin. The face and in front of face is nice. Agree with above some marks behind head and tracks on reverse would keep from 66. So MS65. I really believe they are tougher on more common date Morgans.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36826 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3479 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
I'd say PCGS gave it a 66. I'd probably give it a 65+. Barely any chatter on the cheek or high points, just some in the fields. Beautiful coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'd say solid 65, shot 66.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18684 Posts |
the 82S is known for Sharp and bold strikes which this has. I have to take into account the tracks on the reverse and marks behind the cap as they are prime focal areas. I think those may hold it to MS64+
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
4944 Posts |
Most of you were close on this one and a couple got it right. PCGS MS-65+  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
It sure is a stunner. Man, that luster! I always love your Morgan grading posts just for the eye candy. I was... sort of right!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Super coin, just love it, and cannot argue with the grade.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
Quote:
It sure is a stunner. Man, that luster! I always love your Morgan grading posts just for the eye candy. I was... sort of right! Thanks, and I appreciate it. |
|
New Member
United States
10 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18684 Posts |
good to know that the tracks didnt affect grade on this one.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,014 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/09/2017 10:25 pm
