| Author |
Replies: 62 / Views: 3,377 |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
Quote:I agree, but the OP example does not have the G in God filled in for it to be a VAM 4. There is also some die scratches that can be checked in hand. Maybe the filled G is a late die state. The full coin images show one without the filled G but with the die scratches, and a more worn example with filled G but without die scratches. I'm definitely not a VAM guy though, I just look at pictures. Here's one https://coins.ha.com/itm/morgan-dol...bnail-071515 without filled G, without die scratches, and with a crack from rim through OF. Other examples don't show any crack. So they polished off the die crack before the filled G formed?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
517 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3327 Posts |
No shipping info, yet. I expect it may be on the way in a day or so.
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7626 Posts |
The look of the coin and the price you paid for it tells you everything you need to know about the coin.
Maybe they haven't shipped it because they saw this thread and are rethinking the sale (?).
Nothing surprises me anymore.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Grade and authenticity hard to argue, but they dumb amaze me. I shouldn't even be offering opinions on coins like this.
Edited by Coinfrog 12/05/2023 9:05 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3327 Posts |
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
Edited by Bump111 12/11/2023 3:47 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36832 Posts |
They will test through the slab.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Coin does look different in these new photos.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I still don't like the looks of it. Counterfeits are often composed of the correct metal alloy so the XRF doesn't mean much.
Why would it sell for $50 when it's worth 3x or 4x that much if genuine?
EDIT: PCGS has certified counterfeits in the past. Several years ago there were some on the market they bought back.
Edited by BH1964 12/11/2023 1:25 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
VAM 6 OP  Genuine  The genuine example has more wear than the OP, so the genuine may look a little thicker. The CC position appear to be correct. I am leaning that the coin is genuine, but I still do not like the rounded numbers in the date. The date on a genuine Morgan has a flatness on the top of the numbers.
Edited by Slider23 12/11/2023 5:53 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3327 Posts |
I took this old gal to my LCS. The XRF (as compared to a known genuine Morgan in a PCGS slab of similar generation) indicates that this coin is silver. So, if this counterfeit, it is composed of silver. Given that the certification numbers on either side of this one indicate submissions by the auction house where I purchased, I'm concluding that it is genuine.
I'm still not sure why the PCGS certification page says this coin is in someone's registry set. I'm guessing that is a mistake of some sort. Can't get them to respond to two inquiries.
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
I don't know much about registry sets but can't somebody sell their coin and just leave it in their set? I don't think PCGS polices this any better than they do their population counts.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
Quote: I don't know much about registry sets but can't somebody sell their coin and just leave it in their set? I don't think PCGS polices this any better than they do their population counts. Yes, until the new owner enters the cert number into his/her registry set. At that time PCGS will notify the past owner to remove the coin. If the past owner takes no action in a given time frame to remove, PCGS will remove the coin from the registry set and the new owner can enter the cert number into his/her registry set.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3327 Posts |
Returning to this thread for an update. I've been digging through an avalanche of work since mid-December with little relief! I finally have a weekend off and plan to get this coin under the stereoscope for a more thorough evaluation. Needless to say, the window of return has passed so it belongs to me for better or worse. I received a reply today (finally) from PCGS giving me contact info for the registry set administrator - will be reaching out to them about that question as well.
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
|
|
|
Replies: 62 / Views: 3,377 |
|