| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 1,909 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74846 Posts |
Not a Broadstrike. There would be no reeding on the edge, and both sides would be affected. Not sure what it is.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34428 Posts |
Exactly right @err, I don't think that it is physically possible for only one side of a coin to be broadstruck. Perhaps there has been mechanical wear of some sort that mostly focused on the obv rim.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Moderator
United States
97685 Posts |
I'm not even sure that you can have a single sided broadstrike..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5833 Posts |
A normal well circulated dime with wear and tear on the obverse more than the reverse, you can stack it up against a regular dime and it will have the same size.
|
|
Valued Member
  United States
242 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6561 Posts |
What is the mass?
Is the coin visibly thicker on one side than the other?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
242 Posts |
Brandmeister - The mass is 2.3 grams, and visually it has a uniform thickness all a round coin.
Is it possible that it was struck like 5+% off center?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1658 Posts |
I have seen this quite a bit on dimes from the 1980's, but no clue what does it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12477 Posts |
If it's not an underweight planchet or a weak strike, then all I can think of is a grease-filled die.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Valued Member
United States
242 Posts |
OK all, I think I found the answer to this coin. Not addressing the same year dime, but the details of the 1985 dime, Mr. Diamond addresses, are very similar.
So, are these coins considered an error coin?
"The coin is not a broadstrike. 1985-D dimes are notorious for a poorly struck perimeter, especially on the obverse face. It results from a die that is too convex (a design flaw) and inadequate upset of the planchet (a planchet preparation error)".
mikediamond, Feb 9, 2013
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6561 Posts |
Fortunate that you could find a pro answer to such a specific question! And good on you for sticking with the mystery until you found an answer. =)
I have to agree that it is a strange-looking coin, and it does give the bizarre appearance of being slightly broadstruck on only one face. Might be worth tucking away in a flip with a note about the article, just for numismatic reference.
|
|
Moderator
United States
189546 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
242 Posts |
Thanks Brandmeister!!!
I knew there was something wrong and sometimes you can't accept the first answer. I got lucky that I found that Mr. Diamond response to a previous post. I just googled broadstruck dime and checked out the topics that came up from the search. I actually have 3 of those 1985 D dimes with the same strike.
I still have a few post that I never did get a definitive answer on the error. I guess I will have to refresh them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7174 Posts |
With that first picture, I thought you might have had a one in a million. A 1934 P Roosevelt.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5833 Posts |
Interesting fact from Mike Diamond, so guessing the 85 D or the 84 D dime would be scarce for normal strike without the defect and rare for well strike,.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,909 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/20/2024 8:18 pm
