| Author |
Replies: 44 / Views: 6,508 |
|
|
|
New Member
United States
42 Posts |
It's been a while. I'm delving more into coin collecting info as this is the last year of the Presidential dollars, which means my current collection is ending and I'll be looking to getting something different. I thought I'd chime in then... My thought on the "In God we Trust" motto issue: I'm pretty sure Twain is no longer an atheist (and doesn't mind anymore). ;-) Thanks for the pics, BTW. I hadn't realized these were so small! I am thinking of getting a silver one when they're available. It is indeed odd that Tom Sawyer isn't there, but the jumping frog is... :-/
|
|
Valued Member
United States
311 Posts |
Love the design of these. Hope to own one someday.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1751 Posts |
Any news when the silver version goes on sale. I will need to put some money aside. I think the design is fantastic. Can someone please explain the differences between the 2 silver versions, to this Canuck please.
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12302 Posts |
Quote: Any news when the silver version goes on sale. Monday, Feb 1st at Noon (Eastern) at http://www.usmint.gov. Quote: Can someone please explain the differences between the 2 silver versions. Proof version: Frosted devices and mirrored fields. (Essentially the same as a proof version of a Canadian silver dollar.) Uncirculated version: Satin / matte finish on the entire coin. (Very similar to the Specimen version of the 2013 Arctic Expedition silver dollar.)
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems 01/29/2016 9:40 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12847 Posts |
commems is right on, of course.
Fortunately these, while certainly nowhere near spot, won't break the bank at $45 and $46.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12847 Posts |
Some nice photos of the proof and uncirculated here in this article, with explanation of the different laser frosting levels of the proof. This really makes me want to get a proof now, even with the price hike late last week. http://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/...coin-photos/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
591 Posts |
commems - do you know when the US Mint started doing satin/matte finish on the silver UNC dollars? I just picked up an UNC 1987 Constitution and it definitely has a different surface than some more recent UNC silver dollars that I have.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1247 Posts |
I also, got my half-eagle coin. I plan to get all the coins honoring this man.
to give my opinion on the "IGWT" issue.
I say leave it alone. There are many more religious people than atheists. Beside the atheists already have their own country... California.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
591 Posts |
Our nation's de facto motto was E Pluribus Unum from 1782 (when it was adopted by an Act of Congress for the Seal of the United States) until 1956. It was post- civil war religious zealots and cold war anti-communist fervor that led to IGWT's initial placement on coinage and its establishment as our motto, respectively. Really, all propagandist agenda: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_we_trust I suggest folks educate themselves thoroughly before accepting the status quo. To your point on religious people vs. atheists, this recent survey identifies that approximately one out of three Americans (i.e., not just Californians) identify as non-religious: http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/...-relig-3.pngAnd this should shed some light on the overall legality of IGWT in light of the First Amendment [from http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org...plays-mottos] : Quote: It was an examination of the historical usage of the motto that led the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 1970 to find "In God We Trust" to be compatible with the establishment clause. In Aronow v. United States, the 9th Circuit stated, "It is quite obvious that the national motto and the slogan on coinage and currency 'In God We Trust' has nothing whatsoever to do with the establishment of religion'. . It is excluded from First Amendment significance because the motto has no theological or ritualistic impact . it has 'spiritual and psychological value' and 'inspirational quality.'" Really, this was the court's only option, because otherwise, I believe they would have had no choice but to rule IGWT as unconstitutional! As a coin collector, I appreciate the meaning and symbolism of the images and words that appear on our coins. My point was that the US Mint has a duty to consider historical context and design implications, and the fact that Twain was opposed to IGWT should have certainly been considered in the design of this coin. As I said, IGWT did not have to be placed in his face.  Here is some further food for thought, as people may want to better understand why he was opposed to the motto: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/19...motto-in-godI personally like the Twain half eagle, a lot. Recently, I think the US Mint has been doing a (better) job in designing elegant and timeless $5 gold commemoratives. I think the silver $1 designs could be better, but at least our mint has yet to enter the bugs bunny and superman coin business like some other mints have.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12847 Posts |
Nice post, one_fine_dime. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12847 Posts |
Hmmmm.... looks like the topic is coming up again in Federal Court: http://www.coinworld.com/news/us-co...urrency.htmlThe article even mentions the Twain coin: Quote: Some have pointed to the irony of this issue making headlines at the same time that the U.S. Mint's Mark Twain commemorative coin program offering silver dollars and gold $5 half eagles is released. Twain was not a fan of the addition of "In God We Trust" on coins in 1864 when it was incorporated as part of the design of the new 2-cent piece. In William E. Phipps's 2003 book Mark Twain's Religion, the author quotes Twain as stating, "It is not proper to boast that America is a Christian country when we all know that five-sixths of our population could not enter in at the narrow gate." Twain favored — perhaps in jest — instead using the phrase "The god we trust in" as more appropriate, as Twain said that phrasing would recognize "Within certain judicious limitations we trust in God," before adding, "and if there isn't enough room on the coin for this, why, enlarge the coin."
Edited by CelticKnot 02/01/2016 3:36 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
591 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1247 Posts |
ofd.. are you an atheist?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
830 Posts |
I try not to talk religion or politics, Because everyone is right.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
591 Posts |
stmpvrgn - my personal spiritual views are just that, personal, and they are really irrelevant to this discussion here. I'm not here asking CCF members what God means to them. It seems you likely missed the entire point.
|
| |
Replies: 44 / Views: 6,508 |