Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1882-CC And 1892-CC Morgan Dollars For Grading

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 3,206Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member

United States
108 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2018  8:28 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add matt2442 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Wondering if I can get some feedback on the grade/condition of these Morgan dollars I found today. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks!

1882-CC-And-1892-CC-Morgan-Dollars-For-Grading
1882-CC-And-1892-CC-Morgan-Dollars-For-Grading

1882-CC-And-1892-CC-Morgan-Dollars-For-Grading
1882-CC-And-1892-CC-Morgan-Dollars-For-Grading
Edited by matt2442
04/25/2018 8:29 pm
Bedrock of the Community
numismatic student's Avatar
United States
11910 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2018  8:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismatic student to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
82cc: ms63. nice luster. obverse hair looks weakly stuck.
92cc: ms62. nice luster again with a little more chatter. much better date.

both very nice coins.
Edited by numismatic student
04/25/2018 8:38 pm
Pillar of the Community
Imthealphaomega's Avatar
United States
3210 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2018  8:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Imthealphaomega to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
63 on both
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2018  9:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm at MS63 on both.
Pillar of the Community
Collects82's Avatar
United States
1316 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2018  9:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Collects82 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm at 62 on these, with the 82 slightly better, but not 63 better.

Your '82 has a large die clash, most noticeable right of the eagle's right wing. There are other points this clash can be seen both in both sides, such as a line coming out of Liberty's neck. Use the die crack on the top of reverse to help you narrow down the VAM.
Pillar of the Community
SilverDollar2017's Avatar
United States
8715 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2018  9:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SilverDollar2017 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Both MS-63
Valued Member
OldMoney's Avatar
United States
97 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2018  10:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add OldMoney to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
with everyone saying 63.
the 1882 is a weak strike.
Pillar of the Community
acloco's Avatar
United States
3540 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2018  11:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add acloco to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
63 x 2!
Valued Member
United States
108 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2018  09:57 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add matt2442 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you all for the comments.

I'm not quite sure on VAM indication for the 1882-CC, as I'm new to this. But it looks like potentially VAM-3D.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2018  10:19 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Agree with 63 on both.
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36883 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2018  10:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Both MS-63
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2018  10:52 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
But it looks like potentially VAM-3D.


I agree..

Any thoughts on the '92? (I don't want to be a spoiler)
Edited by dave700x
04/26/2018 10:57 am
Valued Member
United States
108 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2018  8:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add matt2442 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Great - but I suspect that was an easy one!

For the '92, I took a look but honestly I'm really not sure about that one.
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2018  9:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The obverse die is a far date placement and the die crack from the 3rd to 4th left star matches both listings so it apparently boils down to the reverse die. I'm torn between VAM-8 and VAM-9.
Bedrock of the Community
Joseph7420's Avatar
Canada
11922 Posts
 Posted 04/27/2018  12:16 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Joseph7420 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am at MS-63 for both.
Pillar of the Community
hadleydog's Avatar
Canada
1267 Posts
 Posted 04/27/2018  12:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hadleydog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm going to play the devils advocate here and ask the question why the 92-cc, if indeed an MS-63 and problem free coin, has not been graded by PCGS or NGC. We are talking about a $2k plus coin. 99% of the time, there is a reason for that, and it's not usually in the buyers favour.
Not a big fan of the carbon spots either.
  Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 3,206Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.44 seconds to rattle this change. Forums