Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop CCF Members on eBay! Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Modern: Platinum Commemorative Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,883Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 07/14/2020  7:31 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
In the nearly 40-year history of the modern series of US commemorative coins (not including the Bicentennial commemorative coins of 1976-76), the Mint has produced just a single commemorative coin that incorporated platinum - the gold-and-platinum bimetallic $10 coin issued in 2000 to mark the Library of Congress (LoC) Bicentennial.

The first time legislation was proposed for the LoC coins was in May 1997 - the bill differed from the one that was eventually authorized by Congress. This early version of the bill specified the striking of up to 100,000 $5.00 gold coins but also gave the Treasury/Mint the option of striking the same number of $5.00 platinum coins with specifications TBD by the Treasury/Mint.

A new version of the bill was introduced a year later - in May, 1998 - it changed its language regarding the platinum coin and provided the Mint with the unusual option of striking a $10 gold-and-platinum bimetallic coin rather than the typical commemorative $5 gold coin. The Mint hadn't been given such an option before and it proved too enticing to let pass - at the urging of the Library of Congress, the Secretary of the Treasury instructed the Mint to strike the $10 bimetallic coin vs. the $5 gold coin.

Commems-Collection-Modern:-Platinum-Commemorative-Coins
Commems-Collection-Modern:-Platinum-Commemorative-Coins

Unfortunately for the Mint, it experienced production problems that created a higher-than-normal rejection rate. Ultimately, 27,445 proof coins were sold along with 7,261 uncirculated coins. (You can read more about the program in my earlier post here: Library of Congress Coins

The Mint's one-time use of platinum for a US commemorative coin begs the question: "Were there other calls for the use of platinum in the US commemorative coin series?"

In a word, "Yes!"

The first call for a platinum commemorative coin predates the LoC coins and goes back to 1995; it was part of legislation to authorize coins in commemoration of the 150th anniversary of the Smithsonian Institution. The bill, as originally introduced in the House and Senate, did not include any language for platinum coins, but such language was soon added as an option vs. the $5.00 gold coins that were eventually struck. The platinum coin was specified to carry a $5.00 denomination and to be struck on fully platinum planchets (not bi-metallic ones).

The Public Law that ultimately authorized the 1996 Smithsonian coins was approved on January 10, 1996; it had the $5.00 platinum coin option language in it, but the Mint stuck with the traditional $5.00 gold coin (half eagle) for the program.

In 1999, multiple bills for commemorative coins for the US Capitol Visitor Center were introduced. Congress flipped the script a bit and specified the striking of a gold-and-platinum bimetallic $10 coin as its primary choice, but also gave the Mint the option of striking a standard $5 gold coin if it decided that striking the bimetallic coin would not be feasible. The Mint chose to strike the standard $5 gold coin rather than the bimetallic $10 piece for the 2001 program, likely due to the production issues it faced with the 2000 LoC coin.

In 2001, a bill calling for a commemorative coin program to honor Ronald Reagan was introduced in the Senate. It included the specification of a $5.00 gold coin, but also included a provision that would have allowed the Mint to strike a gold-and-platinum bimetallic $10 coin. The bill was referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs but did not get reported out for a vote. Similar Reagan bills were introduced in following sessions of Congress (up through 2005), but none of the bills gained much traction and so no gold-and-platinum bimetallic coin was ever struck to celebrate Reagan's life.

More recently, in 2013 and again in 2015, bills were introduced calling for a commemorative coin program to recognize the 150th anniversary of the passing of the 13th amendment to the US Constitution. The 13th amendment officially abolished slavery in the United States. The proposal called for a $50 gold-and-platinum bimetallic coin, the exact composition was to be determined by the Treasury/US Mint; it also sought $20 gold coins and silver dollars to mark the anniversary. Each of the bills was referred to the House Committee on Financial Services, but neither was reported out.

The Mint has not been ignoring platinum, however. Since 1997, the US Mint has been striking platinum bullion coins, including proof versions for collectors. The call for the white metal's use in commemorative coins has not been top of mind for commemorative coin sponsors, however - CuNi, silver and gold appear to be working just fine as coinage metals for almost all proposed programs. Who knows what the future will hold?!

Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Pillar of the Community
Alpha2814's Avatar
United States
2023 Posts
 Posted 07/14/2020  7:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Alpha2814 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I love that bimetallic piece -- it's the first big-ticket item I bought on my return to the hobby 4(?) years ago. It's a shame we didn't get any more bimetallic pieces (even with base metals) but "production problems" is a good excuse, though plenty of other countries seem to be doing fine with them.

I prefer the look of platinum to silver, subtle as it is, but I understand why it doesn't really fit with the current commemorative line on its own. I wish they still made fractional non-gold bullion. Whole ounces are too expensive.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
CelticKnot's Avatar
United States
12811 Posts
 Posted 07/14/2020  10:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CelticKnot to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Interesting commem, commems. Love the bimetallic composition & look.

I had just started collecting in earnest in 2000 and wish I had been targeting other products such as this besides annual sets, ATB products and ASEs at the time. Oh well. It's still enjoyable seeing it in someone else's capable hands / formidable collection.


Quote:
It's a shame we didn't get any more bimetallic pieces...plenty of other countries seem to be doing fine with them.

Agreed. But the US Mint is also historically more conservative than other mints.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
 Posted 07/15/2020  2:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting!

I hate that we missed having a bi-metallic Reagan commemorative. Would have made a nice companion to my 2016 C&C set.
Pillar of the Community
CollegeBarbers's Avatar
United States
2606 Posts
 Posted 07/15/2020  6:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CollegeBarbers to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That's a beautiful coin, @commems, and an interesting history!

Quote:
It's a shame we didn't get any more bimetallic pieces...plenty of other countries seem to be doing fine with them.

Now that the Mint has ventured into coloring, who knows what the future holds.
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 07/15/2020  7:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It will be up to Congress to decide when/if the US Mint strikes any bimetallic coins (precious metal or base) as the Mint doesn't have the authority on its own to produce such coinage.

Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems
07/15/2020 7:38 pm
Pillar of the Community
Greasy Fingers's Avatar
United States
6990 Posts
 Posted 07/16/2020  10:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Greasy Fingers to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
 Posted 07/16/2020  10:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
... the Mint doesn't have the authority on its own to produce such coinage.
I think now is a really good time to go rogue.

  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,883Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.35 seconds to rattle this change. Forums