Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Shop CCF Members on eBay! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Modern: What If? 1995 US Gold Coinage Bicentennial

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 859Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 11/10/2023  08:33 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
In my recent post about the 1999 Yellowstone National Park 125th Anniversary Silver Dollar (1999 Yellowstone National Park), I referenced an unsuccessful multi-coin bill introduced by Representative Norman Mineta (D-CA) in June 1995. In that bill was included a proposal for $10 Gold coins (Eagles) to be struck "In commemoration of the bicentennial of United States gold coinage."

In 1795, the US Mint produced its first circulation gold coins, a small number of Gold Half Eagles and Gold Eagles with the Capped Bust, Turban Head design - 8,707 Gold Half Eagles and 5,583 Gold Eagles. So, 1995 represented the 200th anniversary of the coinage.

1795 Capped Bust, Turban Head Gold Eagle
Commems-Collection-Modern:-What-If?-1995-US-Gold-Coinage-Bicentennial
(Image Credit: Heritage Auctions, https://www.ha.com.)

The proposed 1995 Gold $10 coins were to have an authorized maximum mintage of 25,000 with a design "emblematic of the bicentennial of United States gold coinage." (I wonder if the designs would have replicated the 1795 designs?) Striking of the coins was to be limited to the 1995 calendar year - the gold coins' bicentennial year.

No sponsor for the coins was indicated, and no discussion of surcharges was included in the bill. This suggests that either the bill's language, as published, was erroneously incomplete or that the coin was intended to financially benefit the US Mint/Treasury vs. a private-sector organization and was (possibly) to be sold "at cost" by the Mint. Also, no size or composition specifications were stated.

In my Yellowstone post, I also mentioned the multi-coin bill introduced by Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) during the same Congress. Moynihan's 1995 bill also called for bicentennial gold coins, but its language was even less comprehensive than Mineta's, leaving the Secretary of the Treasury to determine all specifications. Of note, the language of Moynihan's bill designated that the coins were to recognize the "Bicentennial of the United States" - with no reference to the country's first gold coins. Considering the US Bicentennial was roughly 20 years earlier, this error of omission is somewhat surprising/confusing.

Neither of the bills progressed in Congress. And, as the gold coin did not have a private sponsor to lobby on its behalf, it was not included in the 1996 multi-coin bill introduced by Alphonse D'Amato that eventually was authorized and signed into law.

So, an opportunity to recreate a classic design used on a coin that is out of reach (financially) to most collectors was lost. Too bad.


For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, including other What If? stories from the classic and modern eras of US commemorative coins, see: Commems Collection.




Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Pillar of the Community
psuman08's Avatar
United States
1751 Posts
 Posted 11/10/2023  10:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add psuman08 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting, I would have bought one if it was the 1795 design.

The Landis Mint made these and several others manufacturing them as they were originally created.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15386 Posts
 Posted 11/10/2023  10:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would have enjoyed seeing this one come to fruition - especially if the 1995 coins adopted elements of the original 1795 issues.

Thanks for continuing to share your scholarship @commems.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 11/10/2023  11:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That would have been a great one for sure.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
HondoB's Avatar
United States
24900 Posts
 Posted 11/10/2023  12:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add HondoB to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What a shame that these bicentennial golds never came to fruition.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 11/10/2023  1:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@All: I would have made one of these coins part of my collection as well.

My guess is that the Mint would have used the same specifications as it did for the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics Gold Eagle - 0.900 fine, 16.71 gram weight and 26.9 mm diameter - vs. the 1795 Gold Eagle specifications - 0.9167 fine, 17.5 gram weight and 33 mm diameter. (The 1984 specifications date back to 1837.)



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems
11/10/2023 1:44 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 859Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums