| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 648 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1108 Posts |
I have this problem sometimes when building a set that either the cost, or something else or another, will cause me to get burnt out on completing it or feel "fizzled out," on the way to completion. This happened with my Lincoln Cent collection awhile back when I was down to basically the semi keys (and keys) left. The high cost really had me feeling like  After I had those and the album was "full", I took a break for awhile. However, now, three months later or so, I've regained more interest in it and decided to start venturing into keys and proof coins. I've found this kind of scenario happening with various sets that I collect. Some of them, for example, like my Liberty nickels that I've been focusing on so much in the past three months or so. I've basically filled most of the album and despite their being some upgrades needed and two more of the key date coins left, I'm not interested any longer in completing it at the current moment. I've spent a lot of money putting together the ones I have. So, what do you guys do when you come across these kinds of scenarios/feelings?
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1502 Posts |
Quite the opposite for me, I get a bit more excited each time I fill a slot. But my approach is drastically different than most. My current albums of Lincoln Wheats, Indians, Barber, Merc, and Roosevelt silver dimes are only filled with restored metal detecting finds. Free coins (ignoring gas, equipment, etc...) but the likelihood of ever completing an album is so remote that it keeps me engaged.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
I only had one period were I was "meh" about coins. This was from 2004 to 2008. I had filled all the cheap holes and completed a few sets. I had to transition myself into accepting the bigger prices. It took me a few years until the cost of admission felt worthwhile.
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16806 Posts |
This is precisely why I've never been much of a "set" collector, especially of the date-mintmark fill-the-album-hole sets that are popular with US collectors: the paying of big bucks to acquire the coins needed to "complete the set", coins that are functionally identical to the 200 other coins I already have in the "set" apart from the date and mintmark. And the "filling the album hole" motivation would surely be perpetually frustrated if the only way to purchase those final high-end coins was to buy slabbed examples and thus the coin would never actually physically go into that empty hole.
That's why I collect coins. All of them. One of each type, date and mintmark ever made, from every country that has ever existed and issued coins. And with a budget cap of AU$1000 (US$500) per coin. Since this "set" would be functionally impossible to "complete" (unless you're an immortal trillionaire), I can relax and collect whatever catches my eye and lands within budget. No burnout.
I understand not everyone can be motivated to continue collecting without having achievable "goals" to aim for. That's OK, everybody's different. But the risk of "burnout" is a drawback that is fundamentally built into this concept of set-building, especially in an endeavour a popular as coin collecting where supply and demand means that those final few targets to hit are so much more expensive than the regular coins. The other drawback to this method of collecting is the opposite of burnout: inadequate reward upon successful completion. If one does persevere to the end and "completes the set" - what then? You don't even get a video-game-style "Congratulations, you won!" screen, unless you make one yourself. I'm often astonished to watch people who've pursued completion of a set for decades when they "win", and then they just... give up, sell everything off again, and maybe start again on some other set from scratch - almost like a catch-and-release fisherman.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Valued Member
United States
458 Posts |
I've been collecting for over 50 years. But, in that half-century, I have taken multiple years-long total departures. I maintained what I'd built during those breaks, and there they were when I took it up again...waiting. But I sure understand the feeling of hitting the key/semi-key wall. There are some that I'll never be able to afford in any kind of condition that would please me. Sometimes (for me) that's time to pick up a new series to begin working on.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94765 Posts |
no not yet. Even when I was in the Navy, I traveled with my collection and added to it as I traveled.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Portugal
655 Posts |
I like historical coins, very old ones. But I have shifted focus several times. No point in trying to collect what other collectors seems most interested. Too pricey and too common even when expensive. Too many fakes and frauds to deal with.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7933 Posts |
My attitude/solution:
1. It's a hobby. 2. If it causes stress or burn out, see 1.
Edited by tdziemia 04/18/2026 08:38 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6455 Posts |
Humanist, I have said this before, but I will say it again: you really seem like you would enjoy building a type set more than completing albums with obscure, identical coins. If you feel burned out on a denomination, that's a sign of boredom or frustration. Neither is particularly fun for a hobby. You can need a vacation from a hobby, too. Quote: This is precisely why I've never been much of a "set" collector, especially of the date-mintmark fill-the-album-hole sets that are popular with US collectors: the paying of big bucks to acquire the coins needed to "complete the set", coins that are functionally identical to the 200 other coins I already have in the "set" apart from the date and mintmark. Well said, Sap. This is a sentiment with which I completely agree. I don't think I would experience any triumph from completing the album. If you are filling from circulation, I think you eventually are just on a treadmill of inspecting roll upon roll of coins, knowing that you are down to statistical probability on the last coins. Buying coins, it's just a factor of money, which would not feel particularly triumphant. In fact, the whole reason that I bailed on a PCGS variety set in the registry was that I would have to buy thousands of dollars of boring, identical coins as the points substrate for the actual variety coins. I might do a CAC set, specifically because they do not require non-variety coins in a variety set.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18635 Posts |
yes, but it was more due to funds availability. cant remember how long but it was probably 25yrs as my children were hitting their teens and costs were rising. got back into it when I found this site in 2013. now that I'm pretty much retired and really too old now to continue accumulating I just live my collecting life watching and helping others collect here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
999 Posts |
A few years ago I was at the point of having to spend big bucks to fill the remaining holes in my Canadian decimal collection. I ended up switching to medals. There is such a diverse variety of topics to collect, many are quite inexpensive and allow for higher relief designs than coins. I still have my coins and will occasionally fill a hole, but I'm mainly just adding the current year coins I find from circulation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1108 Posts |
Quote: Humanist, I have said this before, but I will say it again: you really seem like you would enjoy building a type set more than completing albums with obscure, identical coins.
If you feel burned out on a denomination, that's a sign of boredom or frustration. Neither is particularly fun for a hobby. You can need a vacation from a hobby, too.
Quote: This is precisely why I've never been much of a "set" collector, especially of the date-mintmark fill-the-album-hole sets that are popular with US collectors: the paying of big bucks to acquire the coins needed to "complete the set", coins that are functionally identical to the 200 other coins I already have in the "set" apart from the date and mintmark.
Well said, Sap. This is a sentiment with which I completely agree.
I don't think I would experience any triumph from completing the album. If you are filling from circulation, I think you eventually are just on a treadmill of inspecting roll upon roll of coins, knowing that you are down to statistical probability on the last coins. Buying coins, it's just a factor of money, which would not feel particularly triumphant.
In fact, the whole reason that I bailed on a PCGS variety set in the registry was that I would have to buy thousands of dollars of boring, identical coins as the points substrate for the actual variety coins. I might do a CAC set, specifically because they do not require non-variety coins in a variety set. As you can tell, I quite like nickels. Also, Lincoln cents. My Lincoln cents collection I think might be my most proudest achievement for me personally. I've had variances over time in what I find interesting. But now, looking on it, outside of collecting my nickels and adding to my Lincoln Cent collection, there really aren't any coins that interest me enough to say "hey, I want to build an entire set of these." Also, cost is a huge factor. But yes, I thought about building some kind of type set. I would prefer to use a Dansco. However, with the prices that they are at currently, I'm kind of waiting to see if I can find one that is a good deal. While working on my Liberty nickel collection, spending 30-40 dollars on each coin for me, personally, is a lot of money.  I know many coin collectors who spend FAR more with their collection since they can afford it. I, however, cannot. I've been enjoying adding cheap proof coins to my Lincoln cents collection. What a difference in price and enjoyment. There also, unfortunately, isn't that many coin sets out there that are interesting and budget friendly IMO. I recently tried building a set of Roosevelt dimes, and it just isn't doing it for me. It's quite boring. Perhaps I will take a step back and focus on the collections I already have and work on adding to them. But also, I think a type set might be a good investment for me as well. I also think Washington quarters are really interesting. However, the high cost of older silver Washington's is insane and not doable by someone on a budget like me
Edited by Humanist1287 04/27/2026 07:08 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
676 Posts |
You could try Ike dollars, they are pretty affordable. The silver ones are more expensive than they used to be but they can still be found inexpensively. For most of the circulation strikes they can be found at banks occasionally. Many of them are in decent enough condition to be album worthy (in my opinion), but collect what you like! 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
Quote:You could try Ike dollars, they are pretty affordable. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1613 Posts |
Several times over the years. I have two complete Lincoln albums (minus a few in the second), three completed Jeffersons albums and a second Eisenhower thus far trying to acquire the remaining 31 Seated Liberty dimes. Why did I attempt that series again? 
ANA member - PAN Member - BCCS Member There are no problems only solutions - the late, great John Lennon
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
Quote: Why did I attempt that series again? The heart wants what it wants. 
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 648 |
|