So I collect some bullion coins, and enjoy doing so as a hobby. I like completing sets. But I was wondering in a different perspective if it's all just a scam. Perhaps scam is not the correct word. But for example. Lets say I had a bullion bar/round that was .999 fine silver from a third party mint that put the year in which it was created on it's surface. Just like a coin, a certain amount is created. Like why do coins have some sort of numismatic value over generics?
Like I could say with cards, that I could I cut out a piece of cardboard from the 1960s in the shape of the card and it's purpose is to well, be a piece of cardboard. Or I could buy a very rare baseball card from the 1960s worth thousands. However the purpose of the baseball sports card is to collect, not the value or purpose of it just being cardboard. The purposes and functions are different.
However with coins vs generics the purpose is the same, to purchase a certain purity of metal , for the metal content. Is the purpose not the same? A
ASE from 1986 serves the same purpose as a generic from 1986.
I was just thinking in that way. The purpose is the same so why do coins have some sort of numismatic value on it just because it's official coinage from a mint.
While technically
ASE is a currency, it's not purchased as such but for the metal content. Like I can see the difference between a very old penny and very old piece of copper. Obviously the penny has some sort of numismatic value because it's purpose was to be used as currency, while a very old piece of copper's purpose is to be used as well copper.
Is not a very old
ASE vs a very old generic purpose the same, to be used for it's metal content?
Thinking in this way just makes me wonder.

If the purpose is the same, to be used as a purity metal, purchased for the metal content.
Don't get me wrong I love collecting bullion coins but I just started randomly thinking in this way and figured I would post it to see what others think.
I don't know if I worded this well but idk
