| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,315 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1022 Posts |
Is this DMPL. please grade. thanks.   Edited by bishftl 09/25/2011 4:10 pm
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
 , bishftl-- I see no mirror at all, and you missed the date by a century.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Looks like an earlier strike off that die pair but not early enough for DMPL. Nice frosty devises and little or no flow lines off the letters and stars. Still, it looks like a 62 or 63 to me because of the contact marks on the cheek and neck.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
Nice cartwheel! I don't think this would be a DMPL but is still a nice MS-63+.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
I think this is more like a strong MS-64, because those contact marks looks more like luster grazes to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
817 Posts |
I think ShadowCreator is right MS64.
I don't see any reflection.
Put something up next to the coin to see if there is a reflection. If there is take another pic so we all can see.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
158 Posts |
Quote: ...those contact marks looks more like luster grazes to me... I'm a total noob at this, but I was thinking MS-63. And what the heck is a "luster graze" ? Edit : Never mind, I Googled it myself and learned something toady. 
Edited by CitizenPatriot 09/27/2011 11:11 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
 , CitizenPatriot!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6399 Posts |
I agree with MS-63, with no DMPL or PL qualities. Looks like a problem-free, attractive coin. Perfect for a type set!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I would say this one is a solid MS-64 there are some luster scuffs, which don't matter for that grade, and just a couple of very minor hits on the obverse cheek and fields.
I won't go 65 on it but I will say closer to 65 than 63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5650 Posts |
I because of the bag marks and obvious wear on the Obv and Rev coupled with the scratches, especially on Anna's face, MS62.......
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
Most people are still forgetting that an MS64/5 coin must have a problem free cheek! for the last 2 years from the TPG's however its clearly shown by older coins already graded a lot of chatter can be present om the older holdered coins. ESPECIALLY NGC....Morgans dad has it correct at MS62 a fair assesment by todays standards.... one must remember don't by the holder buy the coin...this is the exact reason so many have re-submitted coins......If your happy with MS65 its A OK by me..its whats on the holder...
|
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
IMO this coin is a strong MS63. If it were just a couple luster scuffs on the cheek I would say it had a shot at 64, but it looks like a couple small nicks and too much chatter on the fields to go any higher. And no on the DMPL
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
MS-62 coins usually have impaired luster, large hits to the cheek, and many hits to the fields. This coin exhibits none of that. No chance a TPG would give this less than a 63.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
 , bigjpst!
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,315 |
|