BTW - please - if this post, or my others, is coming across as negative or argumentative - I do NOT mean for them to be.
I have time to kill and am enjoying researching this more and having a
discussion. I actually statred to do the math on this whole situation but am still working on it.
So far the dollar coin usage
IS edging out mathematically ahead as far as saving money goes - just not quite as far as has been claimed. I am planning on doing more just to see what the websites/combined info gives as to actual savings.
trdhrdr said:
Quote:One of the arguments against switching to coins is that when Canada changed from bills to coins there was an increase in prices that people attributed to the switch ...online research ...website from the Bank of Canada that shows the increase ... When I plugged in various one year periods in the late 80's the price increase was relatively stable around 4% per year. I'll let you draw your own conclusions.
http://www.bankofcanada.ca/rates/re...-calculator/ This is very interesting indeed! So I wonder which camp to go with on this now? jbuck knew of the increase and said:
Quote:
My more politically charged northern friends actually blame those referenced price increases on NAFTA (enacted two years before the Twoonie) as being "US Biased" (but that is not an issue for this thread).
I cannot find the Wikipedia page I got when I Googled Canadian Loonie the other day. It mentioned (as a side note) the initial price increases which is why I posted previously that it was not hard to find. Maybe the reference was edited since then?
Whatever the case, there obviously is confusion b/c the link you posted says one thing and experience/and other websites (mainly all I can refer to are comments from Canadians on numerous blogs) say another.
Canadian responses on these sites claim there is/was price increases b/c of retailers taking advantage of what they term "impulse buying." I saw one comment saying how much they hated salesmen b/c of this (I think they meant retailers?). The comment authors say it is easier now to spend the money from a psychological standpoint since their dollar (and now the Twoonie!) are just pocket change.
BTW - Here is just one article at about.coins.com with both US and Canadian comments.
http://coins.about.com/b/2008/07/22...ar-coins.htmNote the people
not living in the country with "forced" dollar coins
like the idea. Note the
people living with the dollar coins in Canada
mention actually having to put up with the exact problems/dislikes that US-promoters of dollar coins are denying will/do exist.
The Canadians mention the banks' dislike of the coins - increased costs of handling them; the weight issue is mentioned numerous times; and there is even one saying they wish they could go back to paper. There also is a post citing the initial issuing of these coins by quoting a saying of that time, "we used to have currency in Canada now we have loonacy."
Another interesting thing I see is that other Canadians who are not caring about the weight are telling others to just spend them to get them out of your pockets!
Hmmm...
Oh no - conspiracy theory - its really to make us all into spendaholics!

Having seen this transition to coins happen (very close to) first hand 25 years ago (I could escape it!), I know my experiences are different than what jbuck said he experienced. I do not know why.
Seeing what people in a coin-only system post makes me feel that I would rather take advice from eye witnesses than from paper/electronic figures. I guess this is why I was not appreciating the coin implementation to start with. I felt most Americans had no idea of the true ramifications. When you get even a few hundred miles from the border, most Americans cannot even list the Provinces and their capitals let alone know what a Loonie is.
...Of course this can also be an advantage - I now live around 250 miles south from where I was before and got a
V nickel out of some change b/c the locals were saying it was "just a Canadian coin b/c their Queen on it." I tried to tell them what it was. But they were not interested.