| Author |
Replies: 81 / Views: 6,433 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1083 Posts |
Mary, I think for now I would try and leave them in the holders to photograph. The yellow cast is from using room lighting I bet. Have you tried using a flash and holding it at an angle to the coin rather than straight on? There is a section here on how to photograph coins. If you are using a digital camera I would just experiment some. The better the picture, the more accurate info you will receive.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
114 Posts |
Yes, it's from room lighting. I tried the flash and it just whited everything out. I'll do a little experimenting as you suggest.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
191 Posts |
quote: Also, depending upon how long they have been in storage, those holders may have PVC in them, in which case they should be removed from those holders and at least put into modern flips or mylar 2x2's.
This is very very good advice, and should be taken. PVC will ruin your collection. I think it would be a good idea for you to transfer the individual coins in to updated holders to prevent contamination. If any of the coins are packaged together in proofs sets...they will be ok in the original packaging. Here is an example: 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
114 Posts |
Yes, I have several of the coins in the original pack- just like your picture with a little mint location "token" or whatever you call it in there. What would be the best holder to transfer them in to? They'll be in a safe deposit box, but some type of album or something so they were compact and easily shown would be nice.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
114 Posts |
Wait- correction- I'm not wanting to transfer the original pack coins, but the loose ones or the ones that are in the holders in the pictures I posted. Sorry, didn't make myself very clear!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
191 Posts |
Edited by Tbar 01/29/2007 9:13 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
114 Posts |
Thanks for the links. I'll check into those.
I just posted more pictures. There are two that I have labeled "Unknown" (possibly Roman?). Sure would like some kind of ID on those. They're my favorites so far!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Mary, welcome to the forum! As you can tell, your collection has generated a lot of enthusiastic interest. You've received good advice so far and like the others, I'm pleased you decided to keep it in the family. They can be a tribute to your husband's grandmother's sagacity for keeping something of such tremendous historical value. You've also taken the first big steps: getting yourself educated on coins before doing anything else. And like everyone else, I'm fascinated by your photos of the coins. You've got enough almost to open your own coin shop if you wanted.  You certainly have a solid base for a very nice larger collection if you so choose. As you upload the images, we'll all be watching. With this large number of members and with the collective expertise beyond belief, you should be able to obtain solid information on most if not all of your coins. Each is a little piece of history and represents its own long gone era whether it was for better or worse - times of innocence, times of trouble, times of war - they've survived this long and thanks to you, they'll survive a lot longer. My own particular interest is Morgan silver dollars (1878 - 1921 with some breaks in dates) and I see you've got some of them (in the GSA holders, they have a fair amount of value - pushing a couple hundred each at a minimum), but I'm also interested in most anything US from the 19th century although I don't consider myself an expert in anything. You've got a potpourri from that century and a lot more, something to delight us all! Thank you! I should add that this is easily the friendliest coin forum on the internet. Our goal (besides manufacturing new collectors) is education of new collectors and expanding the knowledge of us long-time collectors. Fred
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
751 Posts |
Yes, you'll get better pictures outside their holders. And we'd all like to see better pictures.
BUT...
Unless you are committed to very patiently and carefully removing the coins from their holders; very carefully handling the coins, preferably using white cotton or powder-free latex gloves, and not speaking when the coins are near your mouth; and just as carefully repackaging them in 500-some new containers...
I would counsel against that endeavour. Wait until you or someone else in your family really gets the bug and makes it a labor of love.
If there is no PVC damage on any of your coins now, I doubt they are in danger. A chemist among us has explained that the plasticiser leaches out of the plastic fairly early on.
Welcome! And take care of those coins--you are merely their temporary custodian and they will outlive us all with a little care.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
191 Posts |
It looks like you have a 1914d Lincoln Cent...from the pics I would say its a $250 coin, though hard to tell. Oh ...and check your 36d and 37d Buffalo nickels to make sure all the legs are there  . Keep in mind that grading standards have most likely changed from the time your grandmother bought those coins to now. Which might not be a bad thing. Thanks for posting!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
191 Posts |
As far as your Roman coins are concerned....
It looks like they are mid second century AD Philip I, I think.
I know nothing about ancient roman coins but I'm sure someone here does.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
3730 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2254 Posts |
I agree with everyone else's sentiments that it's great you will be keeping the coins.
BUT.....Use caution Mary. I was in the position of inheriting coins as well, and now I am hooked!!! I spend at least 2-3 hours a day looking at coins online and in my den, and of course, I spend quite a bit of time on this forum reading and learning.
You can easily get sucked into this hobby, and you will find that nobody here will help you get back out!!!!!! I am 100% sure you will enjoy this learning curve.
Edited by tights24 01/30/2007 07:00 am
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
114 Posts |
Thank all of you so much for your kind words and information! Tbar- I did a little digging and it looks like you're right about the Roman coins. I have yet to find the exact ones I have on any sites, but I have found ones very similar with the same inscription. I'll just have to keep looking!
I just uploaded pics of coins that are stored in vials 1-10. Is this a bad way to store them? Should I put them in something so they aren't rubbing on each other?
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16845 Posts |
Did someone say, "Roman coins?"  Here are the IDs for the two Roman on your website: Coin 1: Emperor Philip I (also known as Philip the Arab). Titles are IMP M IVL PHILIPPVS AVG. Reverse type: VICTORIA AVG (Victory to the Emperor), winged figure of Victory walking right, holding wreath and palm branch. Minted in Rome somewhere around 244-245 AD. Catalogue references: Sear 8969, RIC 49b. Value £16 in VF. Coin 2: Same emperor and obverse as above. Reverse type: ANNONA AVGG (The annual grain supply of the Emperors), figure of Annona standing holding cornucopia, modius (grain storage vessel) at feet. Rome, circa 245-247 AD. Catalogue references: Sear 8922, RIC 28c. Value £14 in VF. Annona was the minor deity in charge of protecting the annual grain shipments from the provinces to Rome. Without these shipments, the city would have starved. The coins of Philip I and his son and co-emperor Philip II are often similar. The only way to tell them apart: Philip I is almost always shown bearded, Philip Junior is clean shaven. Hope this information has been of some use.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
| |
Replies: 81 / Views: 6,433 |