Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Modern Proof Maria Theresa Thaler?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 416 / Views: 98,384Next Topic
Page: of 28
Pillar of the Community
Archraz's Avatar
United States
3499 Posts
 Posted 03/05/2014  8:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Archraz to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
There is no H62 in hafners catalog. Yes it is listed on the web site but I have problems relying on that website

A collector relies on the book. a numismatist sees the book as a guide only.



Very true. But The designation H62 does seem to make since given the fact that Hafner's book was published in 1984, and H62 functions as a catch-all for post-1986 strikes.

What kind of designation would you give for post-1986 strikes?
Edited by Archraz
03/05/2014 8:48 pm
Valued Member
OLCoins's Avatar
United States
397 Posts
 Posted 03/11/2014  12:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add OLCoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Can I get some help from the experts of what range this 1780 Maria Theresa Thaler fits into? Thanks



Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?

Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?

Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?

Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?

Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?

Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 03/12/2014  09:08 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
IMHO, it is more likely to be a H49 specimen. It is the first modern Vienna MTT restrike. Hafner suggested there were many varieties of this type. One of the notable feature is that two dots on the central Austrian sheild. Henry
Valued Member
OLCoins's Avatar
United States
397 Posts
 Posted 03/12/2014  4:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add OLCoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Okay, so about when does that make this coin minted?
Thanks
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 03/13/2014  08:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A short reply to Sunny. The time fame of H49 was 1853-1890/1900, this is the information from Hafner's lexikon. Henry
Valued Member
OLCoins's Avatar
United States
397 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2014  2:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add OLCoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for your help wonghinghi!
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 03/21/2014  09:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I remember there is no Rome strike (H71)shown in this lengthy thread till now. Though the reference price of a Rome MTT strike is not high in Hafner's book, an average MTT collector will find it difficult to hunt a Rome strike. According to the paper "The Twentieth Century Minting of the 1780 Maria Theresa Thaler" by Ian Fenn (austrokiwi), it was said the Vienna type and Rome type were struke by same die. Before WWII 1935, Italian government obtained the minting rights from Austria through some sort of political means. I find Rome strike (H71) is very similar to H54, H57 and even H49. I buy this MTT which is believed to be a real Rome stike for there is a prominent continuous circumferential die crack on the reverse side (may also be found on the observe side). This finding complies with what the paper said, ..."the Italian insistence of continuing with the genuine die".., that means the Italian government preferred to produce the genuine original Vienna type for the Ethiopian expedition.

My coin is 27.94 grams, 40.3-40.4 mm. Tell me if you don't think it is a Rome strike (H71) after seeing the pictures.
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 03/23/2014  09:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The weight is a bit concerning. Should be above 28.06 grams. That die crack is correct for Rome. The problem with using weight is wear on the coin.....it doesn't take much to shave a few fractions of a gram off a coin. And then there is the accuracy of the scale you used to measure it! If I was betting I certainly would bet against that coin being from Rome
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 03/23/2014  10:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ian, I don't think it is easy to determine a modern MTT from Vienna type to Rome type for the very small difference in %Ag contents used - 83.3% versus 83.5%. The error incurred by different degree of wearing between coins and also the instrumental error in measurement make the distinguish even harder though Rome restrike is theretically heavier than Vianna type. To me, I do appreciated the unique die crack as the sign of Rome restike.

There is another Rome restrike for you to see. Besides there is a circumferentail die crack on the reverse side, a discontinued die crack is also found on the observe side.

The coin is 27.76 grams and 40.1-40.3mm.
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Modern-Proof-Maria-Theresa-Thaler?
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 03/23/2014  12:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Henry as you say the Rome mint strikes are diabolically hard to identify. Hafner only identified one variety. Dr Leypold was the one who noted that Italian Dealers would use the die crack to identify Rome mint coins. It was another researcher Regoudy who identified three Rome mint varieties. the first is a variety that is like the Johnson and Matthey Vienna strike. The second type has a greater gap between the script and the rim that variety it is the non-die cracked version, it is the third variety that has the die crack. to complicate things even further it seems probable that Italy struck MTT after WWII. Dr Leypold suggested that was the case!
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 03/24/2014  07:04 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good note to help to find another Rome MTT. Thank you Ian for sharing your knowledge.
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 04/03/2014  07:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Here is a very interesting ebay listing. The seller has gone to some effort to identify the coin.....10/10 for trying 2/10 for getting it right! Can any one spot what variety it really is?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1780-AUST...em2a3a7e19bb
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 04/03/2014  09:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't believe the information provided: Edge: Length of JUSTITIA 14mm,

It looks like a Paris restrike, type 1 as type 2 is a proof. This one not looks like a proof. So I guess it is a H69 specimen.

H50 is much rarer. I would buy it if it is a H50.

Henry



Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 04/03/2014  11:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't think its Paris. Have a look at the Hungarian cross in the first quadrant of the coat of arms....then look at the pearls in the diadem on the obverse
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 04/03/2014  7:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Oh yes, I miss the Hungarian cross. It should be H68 Brussel restrike.

The saltires between Paris and Brussel are somewhat similar, I made the mistake.

Thanks Ian.
  Previous TopicReplies: 416 / Views: 98,384Next Topic
Page: of 28

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.32 seconds to rattle this change. Forums