Hi Neal, Mr T, others.
Just a quick note to say that I had seen the earlier comments, and actually agree that the coin imaged on my resource site is likely to be a 'dot below' that has become a 'no dot' by means of die fill error, but what has now become commonly known as the 'no dot' through publication, pricing guides, and the passing of time.
When putting the site together, I am trying to get images up first, then go back and fill in descriptions. I have not been able to do so at the rate I would like to, but do find moments when I can add and update content.
It had always been my intention to qualify the images of the 'no dot', both Indian and London, as likely die fills, however I had not put descriptions with images. I had also wanted to let the dust settle to get more input before adding the description, however haven't prioritised it, due to time constraints.
A friend of mine gave me a nudge today, which brought it back to mind, and it also pointed out to me that incomplete information is mis-information, so I have done the descriptions and qualifiers for the 1920 'no dots'.
I have addressed the issue with my opinion, and referred those wanting more information on the Neal's other thread.
1920 no dots, does it exist?Once the revision has finished uploading (4-5 hours .....), I will post the link.
Please understand that my resource site is intended to provide basic information from which people can then expand and learn through more knowledgeable sources.
Regards,
Tim Bowden
TDK APDC
www.tdkapdc.com.au