Nice is not the word for this coin. I would say this is absolutely excellent. 99.9% of these coins are off struck and with a rough porous surface. These were minted for the better part of a 100 years in an increased debased state. Your coin is described as Posthumous although this might be true I doubt it for several reasons. 1) We don't know if there was actually 2 kings named Azes. These were minted by the nomads of central Asia long after the name Azes was coined. It was thought that Azes ruled from 50 BC-5 AD and that there was a successor of the same name 5-25 AD at which time the kingdom that they ruled fell under nomadic rule. 2) The coin has smooth surfaces, that would indicate a high silver content. Meaning it was probably the "original" coin and not a later issue. 3) The legend is clear full and well centered demonstrating a clear effort to make a well centered coin. Certainly this is a superior example to my coin.

Out of your coins I think this one is my favorite and would opt to have this in my collection.
