Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Two Interesting Mexico 8 Reales 1809

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 1,710Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2015  08:43 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi members!

The following two coins have completely different colour; the first one looks silver-made while the second one looks like a debased specimen. Both the observe and reverse show they are from two different dies.

Slight difference in ring tests but both have the property of diamagnetism, that is, they slide down slowly onto the neodymium magnets. The first one is slower than the second one, that is, the first one have a greater silver content.

The first coin is 26.79 grs, 39.5-39.8 mm.

The second coin is 26.93 grs, 39.2-39.5 mm.

To me, the first one is genuine while the second one is a Class 2 contemporary counterfeit. As the second coin was struck from a different die, should it be an earlier Class 2 CC?

Your comments are always welcome. Thank you.





Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809

Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809
Edited by wonghinghi
01/08/2015 09:08 am
Pillar of the Community
coinworldtv's Avatar
Austria
566 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2015  1:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinworldtv to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The first one looks unusual and has a tooled (repaired) edge with a probably restored / repaired edge decoration.

If this coin is authentic than it must have been welded into something once or had a suspension loop.

Also it seems to have been cleaned or heated (from the welding), which might be the reason for the different silver tone.

The portrait looks a bit unusual, which might be the bad photograph.

The second looks quite well to me.
Edited by coinworldtv
01/08/2015 1:30 pm
Pillar of the Community
coinworldtv's Avatar
Austria
566 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2015  1:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinworldtv to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The crowd seems to ignore this post. Still wondering why?

Did Henry (wonghinghi) made anything wrong or are these coins not worth a comment?
Edited by coinworldtv
01/09/2015 1:53 pm
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 01/10/2015  02:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi coinworldtv (Filip), I have no grounds to say the first coin must be genuine, just my guess. This coin was bought in 2007-08 in HK numismatic shop. This is the first coin and I find the portrait is correct. The weight and S.G. are okay so I suppose it is genuine.

The second coin was bought in ebay last month. I find the portrait is not correct as expected. Also, the coin looks like a debased specimen, I say it is "counterfeit". I have no strong theory to say which one is real or counterfeit.

I will do the S.G. for both coins and hope to have more information to make my conclusion.

Can other members to say which coin has a correct king portrait?
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 01/10/2015  03:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I borrow the coin picture posted by RockyRoad in his thread "1810 8 Reales - Fact or fiction?" that I think this is genuine.

Please compare the following pictures :

1)my first coin versus RockyRoad's coin
2)my second coin versus RockyRoad's coin

By comparing the portraits of the three coins, my first or second coin, is same as RockyRoad's coin? Please judge...

(1)
Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809
(2)
Two-Interesting-Mexico-8-Reales-1809
Pillar of the Community
tenbobbit's Avatar
United Kingdom
701 Posts
 Posted 01/10/2015  06:02 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tenbobbit to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think " bob " and the other experts are away at a coin show this weekend which may explain there lack of input, give it a couple of days for their return I think.
Pillar of the Community
United States
684 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2015  3:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Westwood Arms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think first coin is fake, the portrait and edge are wrong. I also think the second one is fake, Ferd's mouth is not right and the lettering is irregular.
Pillar of the Community
coinworldtv's Avatar
Austria
566 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2015  4:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinworldtv to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I do not agree with your opinion.

The first coin has an unusual edge, because it was obviously repaired, the second coin has a different bust, but that is a known variety.

Both coins are probably authentic, the first is just damaged and repaired.
Edited by coinworldtv
01/12/2015 04:24 am
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 01/12/2015  02:05 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
For the first one, I don't see circles in the edge pattern, I see circles with a cut angle.
If this is not from the picture, it's a clear issue.
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2015  09:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Let my first coin be 1 and the second coin be 2 and the coin from another post be 3.

Can you tell which combination is correct?

A)Portrait 1 = Portrait 2?
B)Portrait 1 = Portrait 3?
C)Portrait 2 = Portrait 3?

Please vote by your basic instrict.
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2015  09:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I vote first: B

Pillar of the Community
tokenmast's Avatar
United States
648 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2015  12:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tokenmast to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
c
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 1,710Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to rattle this change. Forums