| Author |
 Replies: 9 / Views: 1,140 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
170 Posts |
Edited by Gold4Ever
03/20/2015 10:17 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
AU details, harshly cleaned.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Did the seller actually label that "MS5something?"  The lighting makes the surfaces look worse than they actually are, I think, so we probably shouldn't judge based on the one set. Circulation is obvious, though, and I'm seeing it more in the AU53-55 zone. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
If it's not cleaned, I'll eat my sock. It's totally the wrong color for a low-AU coin. These branch-mint mid-20s issues are quite scarce in XF-AU with original surfaces.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
170 Posts |
I shot those at 10 mega pix with low outside lighting .. if it's cleaned I don't know if I want to keep it as I can't remove it if I want to send it back. how much value is lost going from AU 55 to AU 55 details ?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
170 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
25 Posts |
Looks like traces of cleaning in the fields of the obverse. The coloration says that it was improperly dipped at the very least - it appears to have the flat dullness of an over-dipped coin, and being circulated, it shouldn't have been dipped at all.
Overall, I'm going to go with AU details.
Don't take a seller's grading too seriously, especially when they refer to a coin as "MS58"!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
170 Posts |
The coin is going back to the seller for full refund.. thanks for all the input..
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,140 |
|
Posted 03/20/2015 7:08 pm
