| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,293 |
|
Valued Member
United States
281 Posts |
Poll Question
Coin 1 or Coin 2 only have room for one. coin 1 is $100 fixed price. coin 2 is a auction which runs out after the fixed price which then I reach a dilemma. which one is worth grading. COIN#1   COIN#2 
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm not sure about worth grading, but coin #1 looks like a 19A. Both sets of images are slightly "lacking" in the quality aspect.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Coin 2 looks dipped. What's the bidding at?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
281 Posts |
it is s 19a good looking out. its at 36 with about 2 days left. I thought the same thing but I didn't want to say anything so not to sway decisions. coin 1 ive bought from seller before and was a good quality coin. really I'm just picture grading coin 1 and it looks like better than the ms-64 on pcgs. the second one is very similar maybe a little better but it looks dipped or altered somehow so I wanted as many opinions as possible before I make a decision. so far I'm leaning towards coin 1. I'm putting together a nice collection for next years auction @ heritage and these seem to hold their premium because the VAM is noticeable to the naked eye. I think I'm going with coin 1 unless someone can sway me otherwise. also a side note, I looked through every 1878-s UNC Morgan dollar and only found two of these. slabbed or raw, which makes me want to buy it even more lol
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
You realize 19A carries a pretty substantial value premium, right? I'd borrow money to buy that one at $100. It's a $150 coin in MS63. Who cares about the other one?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
281 Posts |
I didn't realize. Ty for point that out. Where can I get a price guide for vams?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
In the grand scheme of things, reliable pricing for VAMs is in its' infancy. Too few VAMs have enough sales records for reliable pricing estimates. It's a Hit List 40 coin, sufficient in itself to add value because VAMmers tend to collect by lists, but records of half a dozen total sales don't form a reliable database. Logan McKechnie's VAMs And More website is a very reliable guide of relative worth - Logan is doing more to establish reliable VAM pricing data than anyone else - but he lists "full retail" pricing which may not be duplicable aside a lucky auction audience. http://vamsandmore.net
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
281 Posts |
thanks everyone for your responses. I purchased the coin and will upload photos when I receive. ive bought a few in the last week anc will upload all of them, one in particular the 1928 Peace dollar I posted.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
281 Posts |
received..and photographed.. grade?  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Looks like a solid 64. Can we get pics out of the 2x2 please, it could upgrade 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
281 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Boy is that a difference, unfortunately I see it topping out at 63. Too many small dings on the face and that nose took a good hit. Now as to PL or not, tuff to say but from these pics I'd say it dosent quite make it. Let's see what SsuperDdave thinks, he's pretty good a deciphering tuff coins from photos when possible 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
281 Posts |
PL is possible, how should I photo it? Take a picture with it face something colorful?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I agree with 63. The reverse looks close to PL with a nice frosty eagle but the obverse appears to fall short. Nice example regardless.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Sometimes we get so technical in our evaluations that we forget to step back for a moment and consider what this Morgan must look like in hand, out in sunlight. Holy Cow, what a good looking coin. Its' ceiling might be 63, and it may or may not be Prooflike, but there is no argument regarding the eye appeal. If this is a 63, it would likely be a  or a  on eye appeal unless it got PL. If you haven't taken a nice lustrous Morgan out into direct sunlight, do so. It's a show. 
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,293 |