| Author |
Replies: 60 / Views: 7,629 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
That's fine Jasper I honestly need somebody with actual knowledge that has seen the SMS coins. There's a real lack of knowledge in certain aspects here. No lines on the devices of that dime? How can you compare something that's already incorrectly analyzed to claim something else is wrong because of your lack of attention to details? If he was right then I wouldn't have an attitude. Don't correct me when you're wrong right out of the gate though. That's ridiculous. Your sensitivity to me being upset that somebody could be so ignorant is ridiculous. Don't pass facts based on incorrect evidence elsewhere. If the Dime he claims does NOT have lines on the devices I would have nothing to say about it. He was wrong. Trying to prove me wrong from something he was already wrong about. Suck it up. Admit you were wrong.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
What's the correct way to say that to you? Oh yes, I see exactly what you mean? Knowing darn well there are polish/cleaning lines on the devices! I should've to baby someone who is CLEARLY wrong, trying to say I'm wrong. I consider it polite that I said he needs to take a class in proper examination if he's going to have input on a separate examination. I didn't realize I was in the "everyone gets a trophy, even last place" section of the forum.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
Quote: That's fine Jasper I honestly need somebody with actual knowledge that has seen the SMS coins So it should be obvious to you you're not going to find that person here so go somewhere else with the arrogant insults
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
7096 Posts |
Your original purpose for this thread was to see if the members here agreed that your coins are indeed Satin with Proof Striking. The overwhelming consensus is that they are not. Vilifying and insulting me ( although mildly amusing) will Not change that. I suggest that you stop now before the hole you are digging yourself into is too deep to crawl out of 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
It wasn't meant to insult him. It's insulting that he wanted to argue that mine were so different simply because he wasn't paying attention. It's simple..if you don't have interest in the 1964 SP coins, don't bother to read, let alone post.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
Trout: Can you just admit you were either A: Wrong about the polish lines on the bust because you weren't paying attention or B: Wrong about the lines because you were trying to start an argument? That's all I meant by it. I'm not worried about any "hole I'm digging myself into" in this forum to be dead honest. I feel like you should be able to take some criticism when you're wrong. And Jasper, why should it have been so obvious to go elsewhere? Aren't all of you 100%in the know of every coin ever made? That's the impression I tend to get?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
Unless there's more to gain from this thread, Can one of the Moderators go ahead and lock it
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2668 Posts |
'Go somewhere else' is not something I like to see posted on CCF. (The last thing I would want is Jasper taking offense at my opinion. It's not personal, I have a daughter and a granddaughter I'll introduce you to. They're harder to get rid of than kittens.) I have not read the thread, I won't read the thread. CCF is better than that. Lock this thread or fix the problem, pretty please. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
There's not more to gain because now it's an immature argument between the 3 of us stemming from a response that had no business being posted due to lack of attention to detail and trying to correct me based on my own visual evidence. Ridiculous.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
I think it should be left up so that other newcomers can see how easy it can be to get discouraged over somebody's opinion just because they didn't look at the proof before using that proof as their own counterargument. There's a lot to be said about the pessimistic attitude from certain posts. They said it themselves, if you feel you have something of value in hand, no picture is going to prove it if they can't analyze your situation correctly. This was a pointless few wasted hours..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
Quote: Your original purpose for this thread was to see if the members here agreed that your coins are indeed Satin with Proof Striking. The overwhelming consensus is that they are not. Vilifying and insulting me ( although mildly amusing) will Not change that. I suggest that you stop now before the hole you are digging yourself into is too deep to crawl out of
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
There's no "overwhelming consensus" Jasper. It was one person running with his theory. The only one who seems to be familiar with the SMS is Biedercoins, who pointed out early on that it was being looked at incorrectly. Still cleaned? Maybe from the pictures. But still matching up with pictures of other SMS coins? Yep. There was nothing overwhelming other than one man's flawed assumption he decided to run with and pass as fact when he compared my "cleaned" dime to the SMS Dime. That's not an opinion. That's him implying it is fact.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
Quit acting like a 10yr old taddler too. Grow up. He put his opinion out there with his own theory on why I was wrong..full blast mind you..and was wrong. Now it's my fault for putting my opinion as to WHY he's wrong? That's all it comes down to. I didn't ask in my OP for someone to come on, agree with most of the posters, then blatantly disregard why it may not be so cut and dry. All I want is for him to admit he may be wrong if all he's basing it on is that there are no marks on the devices. That's just not the case and it's very plain to see that.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
This entire thread may as well be deleted because I got my answer. Nobody on here KNOWS anything about the 1964 Special Strike coins. If someone has one or has at least HONESTLY seen one in person, I would love to have a conversation. Other than that this is just pointless.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
198 Posts |
Where I really got lost was in asking him what made the marks on the Nickel from PCGS and I got absolutely no response. Somebody I'm going to take seriously with this matter would have an answer. Why exactly do the Attributed SMS coins, particularly the Nickels, look "cleaned"? One that is not in the know of these coins could've held that in their hand, thought "wow that's ruined" and spent it as 5¢ when it sold for much, much more than a damaged Nickel.
|
| |
Replies: 60 / Views: 7,629 |