As much as I can't speak for what happened to the coin before it came in my hands, the only difference between the first and second set of pictures is a bad bit of lighting. mostly my fault for not being a good photographer. Thank you for your thoughts @Numismatic_Student but could you please clarify for me if you meant that the second set of pictures looked to you like a cleaned coin ( I would imagine it could look dipped) only when compared to the first set, or if something problematic stands out when looking at them alone? In truth I feel neither set of images capture the toning well. The low relief and deep toning on relatively mat fields makes it hard to get both to stand out well at the same time.























