| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 6,781 |
|
New Member
United States
14 Posts |
I have a 2000 massachusetts State Quarter that has a minting error. not sure but I believe it has another coins impression stamped into it also. has stamping errors on the front and on the back. anyone have any ideas about it?   Edited by Babyjay511 10/09/2017 9:22 pm
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
 Photos would be necessary for us to give any real opinion.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7075 Posts |
 There's just no way to tell what caused the unusual marks on your coin without seeing it. If you're having trouble posting a photo, let us know. Maybe we can help.
|
|
New Member
 United States
14 Posts |
Definitely having problems posting photos and I have great shots of this coin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Without pics hard to say ! But if the impressions on your coin are backwards then it is just a vise job. Coins were clamped together and one transferred the image to the other coin but in reverse.
|
|
New Member
 United States
14 Posts |
no, the defect is bubbled outward
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34439 Posts |
Quote: Definitely having problems posting photos and I have great shots of this coin Here is a link to the photo-posting tutorial: https://www.coincommunity.com/forum...g-images.aspQuote: no, the defect is bubbled outward Could be clear glue that hardened between your coin and another one, leaving behind the backwards impression of that other coin. Pics would definitely help!
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
New Member
 United States
14 Posts |
recheck post. added photos
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Looks like damaged on the reverse that pushed metal of the coin up on the obverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
 Thinking coin may have been heated and trapped gas expanded between the clad layers. Thanks, Doug.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74999 Posts |
Halo1st, that's a great guess! I was thinking the same think. Has been heated and that's why the metal got pushed up.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
If it was heated and gas expanded then why weren't both sides "puffed" up? heated gas expanding does not constitute for the indent.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
Quote: If it was heated and gas expanded then why weren't both sides "puffed" up? heated gas expanding does not constitute for the indent. I learned long ago not to question trapped gas. If not allowed to move outward it will surely try and push back the opposite way. If the opposite way is not giving then I'm thinking let it go when and where it wants. Thanks, Doug.
|
|
New Member
 United States
14 Posts |
well anyone else have any ideas?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34439 Posts |
My first thought was heat also. Obviously both sides have taken lots of small damage, but the raised area in the center just looks like someone was heating it. I think that you can safely spend this coin.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: If it was heated and gas expanded then why weren't both sides "puffed" up? heated gas expanding does not constitute for the indent. For the bubble to form there also has to be a gas bubble trapped between the clad layers. No trapped gas, no bubble. The indent is caused by the gas bubble collapsing and the metal still being plastic enough to deform into the lowered pressure area. Could also be the result of the bubble being pressed on while still hot.
|
| |
Replies: 24 / Views: 6,781 |