| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,373 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
768 Posts |
 I know, I know impossible but, you be the judge?
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
A contact mark above the '0' altered the zero. PSD. |
|
Valued Member
United States
441 Posts |
I would say an S mint mark that got really beat up. Pic is too blury to tell from my end though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
i think the op was asking about the mint mark.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
I think it might be a 1916-D that took a hit on the 6
Tim Hughes
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
If you look at the date on a 1910 the 0 is even with the top of the 1.
The 1916 the bottom of the 6 is even with the bottom of the 1.
Tim Hughes
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
768 Posts |
Ok, that's why it's a. D mint mark...it a 1916! Roger
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree, this is most likely a '16-D.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
In my opinion it is a 10-S . The hit above the 0 does not make it look like a 6 . And the MM is so worn that the metal just has that blended in look to it resembling a D . JMHO .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7059 Posts |
I think someone a long long time ago was playing with a 1916D trying to get the look of a 1910D. Then when they didn't get the results they were hoping for just spent it..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1998 Posts |
Looks like a 1910-S to me
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74662 Posts |
I also think it's a 1916 D.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1667 Posts |
1916 D. The top of the 6 got hit down by that hit above it folding it into looking like a zero. No doubt in my mind on it.
|
| |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,373 |
Posted 08/30/2019 8:02 pm
