| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,542 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
242 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
Can't say for certain, but looks at least AU-55, very nice.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say AU-55+. Beautiful coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5585 Posts |
I see very slight wear in the hair below the ear and on the bun in the back. I'm 55 as well
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
576 Posts |
The obverse lacks the definition I'd expect on an UNC coin but that could just be the camera used. Lustre is everything and unimpaired lustre mandatory on UNC coins.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
242 Posts |
Here it is! Absolute beauty in hand, perfect lustre, superb lustrous high-points. Really a nice one. Grade thoughts now?    |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
821 Posts |
It does look like a nice MS+++ but the photos just don't show it. I know, it's hard to get the true look of a coin in-hand. Try a different lightbulb (I've tried 5 different kinds and use 2 different at once now), and if you can take the photo at a slight angle to show the lustre.)
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
242 Posts |
Natural light, lower resolution, but better representative of the lustre.   thoughts? Edited by Loruca
06/14/2020 2:14 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
At least AU-58, could be higher though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9864 Posts |
Much better pics.
MS62
No wear but kinda scratchy on the obverse.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5585 Posts |
I raise my opinion from 55+ to 62/63. Very nice coin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36741 Posts |
I don't see any wear in these photos. MS-63.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,542 |
|
Posted 04/17/2020 2:13 pm
