| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,223 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
Received this from a bullion dealer as a random date coin selection. Any grade opinions appreciated.   Edited by jimbucks 06/06/2020 5:00 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
Looks like a low eye appeal EF, much better than what I would consider a bullion piece
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4692 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say AU-53. Sounds like a good deal.
Edited by Coinfrog 06/06/2020 6:23 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3655 Posts |
AU-50, but I could see AU-53.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Cool you got a Type 2 for a bullion piece. Looks AU to me too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Tough one since the coin is a bit dirty and is very weakly struck. I would say at least AU-53. I don't think gold tones so you might be able to improve the surfaces with some light conservation.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18673 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36780 Posts |
Just some rubbing from bank to bank use. AU-55, possibly 58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4692 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
992 Posts |
I would have left it as is. Looked better IMO. Technical grade AU50-53 to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Obverse clearly has some rub so I think mid-AU is the right grade. Wouldn't surprise me to see it in a 58 holder though. The reverse looks MS which makes a strong case for high AU.
Edited by fenton 06/10/2020 07:34 am
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,223 |
|