| Author |
Replies: 410 / Views: 43,758 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
562 Posts |
One more not so much a fantasy coin.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5177 Posts |
Some of these "fantasy strikes" are really great, but I don't get it why duplicate something like a common US Mint Bicentennial Ike which are readily available on the market.
Edited by NumisEd 04/08/2021 09:55 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187950 Posts |
Interesting examples! 
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12261 Posts |
Quote: ..., but I don't get it why duplicate something like a common US Mint Bicentennial Ike which are readily available on the market. Carr's Bicentennial pieces are not duplicates - they are dated "1975" not "1776-1976" and are meant to stand in for all of the dual-date Bicentennial coins that were struck in 1975 but w/o such date. As with his other fantasy/overstrike pieces, they are fantasy medals/tokens that address a "What if?" in US coinage.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5177 Posts |
Quote: Carr's Bicentennial pieces are not duplicates - they are dated "1975" not "1776-1976" and are meant to stand in for all of the dual-date Bicentennial coins that were struck in 1975 but w/o such date. Apart from the date, they are indistinguishable from the real coin? If so, then I still don't see the point. However, making a coin with the same date as the original BUT with a different (non-existing) strike (say proof), THAT would be interesting. For instance, take a 1925 MS Peace dollar and overstrike it to turn it into a 1925 PR69DCAM Peace dollar.
Edited by NumisEd 04/08/2021 1:21 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187950 Posts |
Quote:However, making a coin with the same date as the original BUT with a different (non-existing) strike (say proof), THAT would be interesting. For instance, take a 1925 MS Peace dollar and overstrike it to turn it into a 1925 PR69DCAM Peace dollar. Like the 2009 ASE proof above. 
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12261 Posts |
Quote: Apart from the date, they are indistinguishable from the real coin? If so, then I still don't see the point. Of course, you're welcome to your opinion. I do wonder, however, about what all the collectors who collect series by date would say - to them a date change is fairly significant!
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5177 Posts |
Quote: Of course, you're welcome to your opinion. I do wonder, however, about what all the collectors who collect series by date would say - to them a date change is fairly significant! Well, yes. But if you are a collector of business strike Peace dollars, the Daniel Carr 1918 Peace dollar should not be part of that series as it is NOT a business strike.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
2009 proof?  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
562 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187950 Posts |
Nice example! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
81 Posts |
Edited by Gluggo 04/09/2021 5:04 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187950 Posts |
Impressive! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
81 Posts |
 Now for the other side! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5239 Posts |
I don't understand why these fantasy items fetch such huge prices. Granted, they are well made, but I have a number of well-made fantasies that don't cost moon money, to say nothing of some extremely well-made medals which sell for little more than bullion.
|
| |
Replies: 410 / Views: 43,758 |