First Page
Posted 09/15/2024 07:59 am
I in no way intended, nor is it my intent to "ruffle your feathers" so to speak.
I visit this site to learn; and I comment to try to learn more and/or help others when and if possible.
Ah, now I see... you "unwillingly chose" an uncirculated 2015-P Reverse Proof silver dime as a pocket piece.
I obviously missed that among the harangue.
I stand corrected; your pocket piece does indeed have numismatic value, although, in my humble opinion, the numismatic value is limited due to its significant wear.
Do you assert that a coin not intended for circulation has an increased numismatic value if it is has been circulated? I ask only for edification, as this seems counterintuitive to me. It is my understanding that, in general, the value of coins not intended for circulation is usually higher if they are kept in their original, uncirculated state. Circulated examples of such coins typically have lower numismatic value.
Assuming that the intent of your original post was to solicit an honest grading opinion of this coin, it appears that you have received some honest feedback ranging from damaged no grade, to FR2, to at best AG04.
Rereading this thread was helpful to me in that I have learned something new... I was unaware that 2015 reverse proof dimes were issued as part of a series of commemorative coins celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy half dollar, which was first introduced in 1964, and that this series included a range of coins, including a special reverse proof version of the silver dime; nor was I aware of their numismatic value and mintage figures. Grading opinions were also helpful, as this is one of many areas in which my experience is lacking.
Thanks for posting.
Cheers.
I visit this site to learn; and I comment to try to learn more and/or help others when and if possible.
Ah, now I see... you "unwillingly chose" an uncirculated 2015-P Reverse Proof silver dime as a pocket piece.
I obviously missed that among the harangue.
I stand corrected; your pocket piece does indeed have numismatic value, although, in my humble opinion, the numismatic value is limited due to its significant wear.
Quote:
I have 10 so 74,990 others out there and I am sure no others are circulated.
I have 10 so 74,990 others out there and I am sure no others are circulated.
Do you assert that a coin not intended for circulation has an increased numismatic value if it is has been circulated? I ask only for edification, as this seems counterintuitive to me. It is my understanding that, in general, the value of coins not intended for circulation is usually higher if they are kept in their original, uncirculated state. Circulated examples of such coins typically have lower numismatic value.
Assuming that the intent of your original post was to solicit an honest grading opinion of this coin, it appears that you have received some honest feedback ranging from damaged no grade, to FR2, to at best AG04.
Rereading this thread was helpful to me in that I have learned something new... I was unaware that 2015 reverse proof dimes were issued as part of a series of commemorative coins celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy half dollar, which was first introduced in 1964, and that this series included a range of coins, including a special reverse proof version of the silver dime; nor was I aware of their numismatic value and mintage figures. Grading opinions were also helpful, as this is one of many areas in which my experience is lacking.
Thanks for posting.
Cheers.
