| Author |
Replies: 88 / Views: 6,048 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5774 Posts |
This is an interesting discussion. I do agree that the XRF at NGC seems most likely since there was no plastic to interfere with any readings. Why not take this coin in its slab, a regular War Nickel in a slab (NGC preferably), and an un-slabbed War Nickel and get the test done at the same time. Then the results can be compared to see if the slab may affect the readings. I'll also mention that it's possible (although not likely) that nickel blanks could have been punched from rolled sheets of foreign alloy that were produced at the mint.
Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups. We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2731 Posts |
"Pride is yoked with callous behavior, as humility is with compassion." St. Gregory Palamas Top Finds - 1969-S 1c FS-101 http://goccf.com/t/477681 1976 D WQ FS-101 http://goccf.com/t/382777 - 1968 D 1c FS-801 http://goccf.com/t/422254Cool clashed dies - 1972 D 1c http://goccf.com/t/429855&SearchTerms=CCLStruck-In Rim Burr - 1969 S 1c http://goccf.com/t/425587&SearchTerms=burrFloating (Type II) Counterclash - 1978 D 1c http://goccf.com/t/434991&SearchTerms=1978
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
67 Posts |
Alright new data incoming. And unfortunately I think it only causes more questions &  . However the silver/copper results are close to the goldscope which lends credibility to both. Additionally, manganese does show up through plastic on the loose war nickelthough there is attenuation happening on some elements. Took it to a gold bullion shop, they had a thermo scientific niton analyzer XL3T300. Potential error War Nickel scan: 76.03% silver, 17.82% copper, 1.73% lead, 1.25% cadmium, .54% ruthenium. Another loose 1944-P War Nickel: 46.36% silver, 43.11% copper, 6.40% manganese, 3.07% Titanium. Loose 1944-P War Nickel inside a plastic coin capsule: 61% silver, 33% copper, 3.19% manganese, 2.81% Titanium
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
67 Posts |
Looking at the data I'm now inclined to say that NGC's copper/silver % is correct and this isn't Ethiopian alloy. However I am also inclined to say this slabbed coin indeed does not have manganese as we saw even higher attenuation with copper than manganese so we should still be seeing something even through the holder. Plus there are significant other heavier trash metals which are probably what the missing 9% is on the report.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
67 Posts |
One small correction, the slabbed coin had 1.73% Palladium(Pd) not Lead (Pb).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25241 Posts |
Quote: what is the weight? pretty sure it was 4.72 grams Since silver is denser than copper, if the coin was 80% silver it would be heavier than 5 grams.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
67 Posts |
Hondo, yes with the confirmed attenuation through plastic it is probably not 80% silver. Trying to nail down it not having manganese.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10547 Posts |
Well it was wartime - who knows what, and how much of, they were melting down to produce roll stock. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5185 Posts |
Would be cool to hear what the Mint has to say about it.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
114 Posts |
Well if it contains 1.73% Palladium. And Palladium is at $966 an ounce
What is the worth of .081656 grams of Palladium?
Google sez $31.88 per gram. So $2.60 Palladium value.
I think we are in the background noise territory and trying to read static
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
67 Posts |
I found another gold shop that'll xrf the coins for me, looking to stop by tomorrow morning. Stay tuned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3535 Posts |
Standing by for further announcements. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts |
That is good news, but would you think they should indicate their findings on the coin holder (slab)? Such as containing 40% silver. Just a thought.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts |
Does XRF machine make a mistake or maybe the person does not know how to read the result. Just " eany meeny miny moe". I sure have the same problem. But the only difference was the same XRF machine was giving two different percentage rate results, and by different people. The XRF machine says this coin contains silver. They told me it is silver plated. But just a minute, this coin is supposed to be no silver content coin. But the XRF says it has silver. Investigation and more research will be done. I might be holding a fortune. PCGS wants $300 fees. I will share this coin in a near future.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
67 Posts |
Dough101 - let me know what your experience is with PCGS. Per NGC's website if it's a metallurgic error they will print up to three of most abundant elements that aren't trace with % on the label. Problem is it seems like for War Nickels there was a lot of variability of the metal ratios during ww2 probably due to rationing and war efforts. However I plan on pressing NGC to label this as an error if it contains little to no manganese as that would be a clear violation of the composition standard.
|
| |
Replies: 88 / Views: 6,048 |