| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,454 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
Edited by jdsstrat 02/25/2025 11:28 pm
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
I cannot offer an opinion on its authenticity, but I have to say I am impressed with how this and the other coins have been passed down from generation to generation. 
|
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
Looks like an evasion copper. Probably light weight compared to a regal issue.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
VERY light weight and thanks for links, jbuck.
Funny story about my grandfather's store: I was about 7 or 8 when he passed but I can remember being there at least once. Unbeknownst to me, he had filled his coin counting machine. But when he turned it on he told me it was MAKING money instead and of course I believed him. Unbeknownst to him (or maybe not), he had created a monster.
Edited by jdsstrat 02/26/2025 10:54 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote: thanks for links, jbuck. My pleasure. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote: Funny story about my grandfather's store: I was about 7 or 8 when he passed but I can remember being there at least once. Unbeknownst to me, he had filled his coin counting machine. But when he turned it on he told me it was MAKING money instead and of course I believed him. Unbeknownst to him (or maybe not), he had created a monster. Great story! 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
I'm still stumped. Can anyone with access to the Atkins and/or Galata catalogue find an example of an evasion copper with this design and this legend (GEORGIVS III D G REX) including Britannia's shield leaning left, as this one does?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
945 Posts |
I have the Galata/Withers token book, which list evasions, but most of them only by words, not pictures. Without the legend or date on the reverse it is impossible to home in on which this is in this list. The range with the Georgius III Rex obverse are numbers 225 to 229. (230 has the same legend but portrait facing the other way.)
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
375 Posts |
My gut reaction is that it's a counterfeit. Evasives usually had something in the legend which the manufacturer could point to as evidence of it not being a halfpenny, hence the name. But having said that, the obverse doesn't look much like George III. Very interesting coin.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
128 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
Brummagem, are you aware of George III coin that included the D.G. in the legend of the obverse before 1797? I may be missing something but if I'm not, how can the 1777 Evasions above be from 1777? Unless the counterfeiters introduced the D.G. to the legend? Am I making sense here or just missing something basic?
Edited by jdsstrat 03/02/2025 3:57 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
128 Posts |
Hi :) This coin was probably minted later than the 1777 date - c. 1790s may be about right. Evasions had all sorts of imaginary legends, in theory, to "evade" the counterfeiting laws. The concept being that if the legends did not fit a legal tender coin, then it was not a "counterfeit" but simply a token offered for barter. Of course the evasions were so similar in appearance at the legal halfpennies that they often just passed in commerce as a halfpenny. That was the intent anyway.
"D.G. Rex" would not have been unusual for it to be picked up by a maker of an evasion before it being used on the 1797 cartwheels. I think it was also used on some of the 1722-23 William Wood coins. Some of the other evasion legends are much more creative!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
Quote: "Some of the other evasion legends are much more creative..." Yes, I've noticed (:
Edited by jdsstrat 03/02/2025 7:13 pm
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,454 |
|