| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,774 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
878 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2170 Posts |
AU-55 Edit: I posted after the reveal, but I didn't see it until now. No way is this Morgan an UNC., the rim on this coin proves that...
Edited by CoinForMe 02/11/2026 7:35 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
398 Posts |
CAC. Wanted to use CAC for grades on a few of my tougher find coins. Better obverse photo now that I kind of know Joe to take pictures. 
Edited by Odee13 02/11/2026 8:08 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18665 Posts |
CAC is going to be tougher to slab a coin. probably not the best choice for a higher end CC Morgan as if you intend on selling the coin in the future most folks just look at the slab and dont grade the coin themselves. it was a roll of the dice. I'm not hearing good things about CAC for grading. I think they should have just stuck to what they were doing.
one thing I noticed is the blotchy toning around all of the stars and letters on the obv. this may have led CAC to think something was done to the coin but they couldnt decide if it was cleaned or not or it was borderline. they may have thought that the surfaces were not original when looking at that and the subdued broken luster as well as the area near K2-3 obv and along the top of the cap to make the questionable surfaces call.
would PCGS or NGC have seen it differently? hard to tell but they probably would have came to a similar conclusion. the may have called it UNC details (cleaned) designation. not much difference but I think I would rather have a cleaned designation rather than questionable color but thats just me. its still a high end CC coin but obviously doesn't have the value a straight coin would have.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
398 Posts |
Thanks panzaldi. My thought is it could have come back details from any TPG so might as well have it done at cac, especially in the case it straight graded, I like to live on the edge lol. I have no plans on selling coins. I don't really plan on grading many but I wanted the 1901 s cac graded so I just threw this in as well. I agree with you statement that cac might not he the best for higher end Morgan's if planning on selling them, at the same time you could argue this the other way as well. (Side note, I found this coin for $199 so can't complain nor would I as I know the risks of my reckless Morgan hunting lol)
Edited by Odee13 02/12/2026 12:05 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The example looks like it has been dipped, but the dark areas around the date and UN would not come clean. The TPG's do not typically call out a UNC coin for being dipped.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18665 Posts |
i can see why you took the risk and went with CAC. CAC would not be my first choice in grading a coin. to confirm a previous grade and assign a bean is what they do best and they really should have just stuck with that
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
878 Posts |
100% agree with PZ, for higher end coins, I'd go PCGS and then depending on the grade and overall quality of the coin, consider sending to CAC for a bean.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
398 Posts |
I didn't think of that Adam, good point. Live and learn. What works have happened though if pcgs gave it a 63 then I paid for the bean and didn't get it because cac saw it as a 62? Just a loss of cash?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
878 Posts |
It's all a risk/reward proposition. The key element is the actual objective evaluation of the coin, if there was a such a thing, and on the grade required for it to be financially worthwhile to submit in the first place. Once graded then whether the coin may be considered choice for the grade and worthy of a bean.
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,774 |