| Author |
Replies: 87 / Views: 4,043 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5604 Posts |
If I could chose I would go with what Gilly Stated, I am hoping the 2026 Enhanced Uncirculated American Silver Eagle has the Same EU finish as the 2013-West Point Enhanced Uncirculated ASE.  It is Sweet Also. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
745 Posts |
I posted this comment in the topic about ASE finishes but it seems appropriate for this topis too I've never heard the term bullion used for the collectable ASEs, the mint uses Uncirculated or Burnished. Based on the US Mint pictures I think the 2026 Enh UC version will look like the coins in the 2017 Enh UC Set Mostly an intentional matte finish with just the raised letters and fine details receiving the enhancement Here is a side by side comparison of the US Mint images of the 2013 and 2026  I understand that these are not images of real coins but rather some sort of image generated from the design files If you compare those to the 2017 image of the half dollar you will see the 2026 looks more like it than the 2013 I haven't found the US Mint Image of the obverse yet but here is the reverse 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Quote: I've never heard the term bullion used for the collectable ASEs, the mint uses Uncirculated or Burnished. Based on the US Mint pictures I think the 2026 Enh UC version will look like the coins in the 2017 Enh UC Set I looked at the Mint website. To me and I'd think to anyone, they are not displaying the enhancements at all. Just a dual date and privy mark on what looks like a standard Uncirculated ASE. To an extent, all ASEs can be considered bullion. But there are collectible versions, the ones the Mint sells to the public. The standard yearly issues are proof and Uncirculated. The non collectible, "true" silver bullion versions, we all know that is almost like a separate "branch" of silver eagles in how they are sold and distributed. We also know that there are collectors of the bullion versions, especially since we can identify the mints that produced them, people get them graded, etc. So there are collectors of bullion versions. It's almost like the mint was trying to keep some of these facts hidden about the bullion versions. It took a freedom of information act inquiry to get to the bottom of the codes on the monster box straps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
745 Posts |
Quote: Gilly wrote
To me and I'd think to anyone, they are not displaying the enhancements at all. I know this images are not photo realistic, but they do have a certian "look" that is representative of the final product All 3 of the images in my post are original US Mint images The 2013 coin has 3 distinct surfaces that you can discern However, the 2017 half and 2226 ASE both have the same "look" The 2019 images are simular to the 2013 just reversed 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Quote: The 2019 images are simular to the 2013 just reversed I'm sure you know this, I'll just repeat known info; The 2013W is an Enhanced Uncirculated ASE. The 2019 (either S or W) is an Enhanced Reverse Proof. The devices are similar, maybe slightly different treatments, I could get another post up comparing the 13 and 19. The main thing is you can't really say the fields are opposite, the 13 is what the Mint considered an Uncirculated field, while acknowledging it's shinier than a typical Uncirculated ASE. A Reverse Proof has a matte type field, like prior years Reverse Proofs, the difference is the enhancements they made to they made to the ERPs. Attached image you have probably already shared of the US Mint site image of this year's Enhanced Uncirculated. I think anyone would agree that this image shows no enhancements, just the dual date and privy and no indication of what or where the enhancements will be I'm sure it'll be stunning. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
The post I just made made me think: One finish I don't think the Mint has ever done: An Enhanced Proof?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5604 Posts |
This is an Awesome read, I agree with what You, Gilly are saying 100%. I too believe the mint's agenda for the 2026 American Silver Eagles will be Outstandingly Remarkable..... ps, The topic is the Enhanced Uncirculated ASE's... ( not proofs ) 
Edited by Morgans Dad 03/12/2026 1:30 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
745 Posts |
Quote:Gilly wrote The 2013W is an Enhanced Uncirculated ASE. The 2019 (either S or W) is an Enhanced Reverse Proof. I wasn't incuding the 2019 ASE as an example of an ENH UC ASEI just include that picture to demonstrate that what every program the US Mint uses to generate images created 2 very distinctly different types of image for their Enhanced UC Coins The 2013 ASE image looks very different compared to the 2017 Kennedy half dollarThe US Mint generated images of the 2026 Enh UC ASE are more closly aligned with the 2017 version than the 2013 version
Edited by Boba Debt 03/12/2026 1:41 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5604 Posts |
Enhanced Proofs , I know of Two Enhanced Reverse Proofs, In the ASE Series, 2019-S and W Enhanced Reverse Proofs, .. An Enhanced Proof ,...  Maybe
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Quote: An Enhanced Proof ,... Maybe Yes, by definition, the proof would have the polished/ mirrored field and frosted elements. So Enhanced Proof would be "that", plus the enhancements done on the elements and lettering. It would be pretty cool and hasn't been done, at least on an ASE.
Edited by Gilly 03/12/2026 1:46 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Quote:The US Mint generated images of the 2026 Enh UC ASE are more closly aligned with the 2017 version than the 2013 version I still maintain that the Mint isn't showing any enhancements on the image I posted or any of the other images they've posted if the next ASE release. And it's not a prior year image as it does show the dual date and privy mark.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
745 Posts |
Quote: Gilly wrote I think anyone would agree that this image shows no enhancements I disagree, the letters and privy mark look different from the field in the same way the as the 2017 Enh UC Kennedy And the overall coin color is darker just like the 2017 Here is a side by side of the 2022 Burnished ASE, 2026 Enh UC ASE and 2017 Enh UC Kennedy 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Ok, we can just agree to disagree. I read your comments and looked at your images and I still don't see the difference. The darker tone yes, but nothing on any of these images that represent a polished surface like in the 2013 images you posted. I'll still try to get and to posting differences between the enhancements on the 2013 vs the 2019 Enhanced versions. The Kennedy half I'm generally just staying away from as it is a different design.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
745 Posts |
The 2013 image I posted in the US mint's generated image from their web site catalog
It was generated in the same way the 2017 and 2026 images were generated.
The fact that the CAD program. or what ever program the mint uses, created the 2013 image with 3 distict finishes compared to the 2 finishes for the 2026, leads me the beleive that they will not be the same.
Personally I hope it's more like the 2017, that way we will get a different type of Enh UC finish for the series
Edited by Boba Debt 03/12/2026 2:30 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Where is the info coming from that says the 2026 EU will only have 2 finishes? I guess I didn't notice you mentioning that before. I looked at the mint website and nothing says anything about the number of finishes. I'm assuming similar application to the 2013. Never paid much attention to the Kennedy versions.
|
| |
Replies: 87 / Views: 4,043 |