Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Shop CCF Members on eBay! 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Modern: What If? 1975-76 American Revolution Bicentennial - Endcap

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 215Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12253 Posts
 Posted 04/09/2026  07:23 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I've discussed previously how the Treasury/Mint support for the United States ("US") Bicentennial coinage program was based on it being reasonably confident in its ability to produce the target coins in large enough quantities to meet the demands of circulation, collectors and souvenir seekers. The Treasury/Mint didn't anticipate the reality of increased coinage demands in 1974 and it had to reach out for potential new solutions.

Gilbert Stuart Portrait of George Washington - Circa 1798-1800
Commems-Collection-Modern:-What-If?-1975-76-American-Revolution-Bicentennial---Endcap
(Image Credit: Metropolitan Museum of Art. Public Domain.)

As 1974 progressed, the US experienced an "unexpected surge in coinage demand throughout the nation." (Senate Report 93-1303) This increased demand level meant the Mint was being used to capacity to produce the coins needed for circulation (primary among them, the Lincoln Cent). It also meant that the Treasury/Mint no longer believed it could commit to the production provisions - especially the Silver Clad coin mintage of 45 million coins by July 4, 1975, as outlined in the Public Law that authorized the Bicentennial coinage.

The Treasury/Mint developed a backup plan - a bill that would authorize it to produce (if necessary) coins of the then-current design (i.e., non Bicentennial) and date them "1975" as well as benefit from a one-year extension (until July 4, 1976) on the deadline for producing the full quantity of the Silver Clad coins.

The bill was sent directly to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ("Committee").

The Committee reviewed the Treasury's proposal and supported it. The Committee reported the bill favorably, with a recommendation for it to pass. The Senate passed the bill in December 1974 without objection or debate - the bill was sent to the House for concurrence.

In the House, the bill was referred to the House Committee on Banking and Currency. The House Committee, however, did not move the bill forward.

As a result, the Treasury/Mint distributed coin production across its active mints (i.e., Philadelphia, Denver), its Assay Office in San Francisco (Silver Clad coins) and facilities not previously engaged in coin production (e.g., the West Point Bullion Depository) and maintained a full work schedule to address demand. The Silver Clad coins were struck throughout 1975, with many beyond the original July 4, 1975 deadline; a number were struck in 1976 to meet demand. In total, 45 million coins (15 million three-coin sets) were produced.

So, no official legal tender "1975" Quarter Dollar, Half Dollar or Dollar with non-Bicentennial designs were produced. If you enjoy Daniel Carr's Fantasy Overstrike pieces, however...


For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, including more "What If?" stories, see: Commems Collection



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15388 Posts
 Posted 04/09/2026  08:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I find it odd that the House did not act upon what appears to be a reasonable request from the Treasury.

Wonder if there was some back-room animosity or political maneuvering in play?

Thank you for sharing the story.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Bedrock of the Community
Earle42's Avatar
United States
10029 Posts
 Posted 04/09/2026  09:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Earle42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the great read. I remember the excitement, even from non-collectors, when the new Bicentennial coins came out. It was a lot more special back then to see a new design on a coin. Everyone was used to the same thing all the time. I kind of think this is why the 2026 coins are not making a huge splash with everyone. We are so used to seeing a new design all the time. Back in the 70s people avidly searched to see if they got one of the "new" Bicentennials. Now I doubt most people even note they have one or are aware of them. I like the new quarter designs for the most part, but afraid the 2026 coins are not getting the recognition they deserve for what they represent. Really like the new dime.

As a kid I remember dreaming I had found a 1975 Ike, half, and quarter. As you said, and thanks to Daniel Carr, I had that dream come true (or as close to it as possible).
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12253 Posts
 Posted 04/09/2026  09:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I remember the excitement, even from non-collectors, when the new Bicentennial coins came out.

I do as well - we're dating ourselves! - the various coins and medals of the time fired up my collecting interests and led that young boy to a life-long hobby.

I agree with your assessment regarding excitement levels over the recent coins. Finding something "New" and/or "Uncommon" always has a special thrill - it seems to be missing at present.


PS Congrats on the recent milestone!

Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems
04/09/2026 11:25 am
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187641 Posts
 Posted 04/09/2026  11:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is interesting to see we came close to getting 1975 dated quarters, halves, and dollars.
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12253 Posts
 Posted 04/10/2026  08:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Wonder if there was some back-room animosity or political maneuvering in play?

I wondered about the same, so I dug in a bit more.

I believe that by the time the measure had reached the House, the Treasury/Mint had determined that between the 1974-dated coins it had produced and stockpiled, and the dual-dated Bicentennial-design coins it could produce in 1975, that it could meet public demand for circulation and collecting coins and the contingency plan of the proposed bill would not be necessary.

I did not find any official statement that reflects this conclusion, but history tells us that the experienced reality of the time was that enough coins were produced/available. So, the supposition seems plausible (at least to me!).



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15388 Posts
 Posted 04/10/2026  09:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good insights commems, thank you for the follow-up.

I refer to these as 'informed speculation insights'. While there are no known historical documents to support a definitive conclusion - a historian such as yourself can combine known facts with the events of the day and arrive at a plausible supposition.


Quote:
So, the supposition seems plausible (at least to me!).


Which is exactly what you did.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94728 Posts
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187641 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2026  12:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I wondered about the same, so I dug in a bit more...
Thank you!
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 215Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums