| Author |
Replies: 265 / Views: 17,279 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
I agree with that Oz, but I believe it still to be caused by rust.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
I can agree with you that rust is the cause, but I have to wonder this one point.....As with all dies, and all the years dies where made... they are hardened high grade steel...... which will rust easily...this is not a new phenomenome...how ever how did not all years suffer the same issues of rusting.. I must only assume that the dies were oiled to prevent the possibility of rusting....metal work was not an unknown idea of the times as it has been known for millenias,,, one must conclude that the dies were oiled to prevent rust from forming on the surface of the dies.....yet this is a joe-blow working environment where when the3 time clock runs out..the day is done.. reguardless If we didn't get the dies oiled.. If you have any experience in production lines, then you can see where there is room for error, when the production line is made to prevent any errors..the process in fact has loop holes..AS in pitted coins, they don't involve all the years....so there is something else in the process that allows for the error... Yet I for one can't see why such a crap like rust DEMANDS so much attention...Vams have been base on simple attributes, like doubling and clashings...now to wedge on into nothingness we find rat droppings and proclaim them as something special.... Truthfully....I hate advertising....it only promotes it self...got to keep up with the Jone's....Yea they died out in the 70's... But they keep promoting the "NEW" you you get sucked into something that later you find its never been new...NUFF SAID
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
LOL... I cant tell... did you answer your own question? Was that whole statement rhetorical?
If not here is my explanation... The environment has to be right for rust to occur. As for oiling, we know that grease was used after polishing (we have all see strike-through grease... coins today still have it) So the dies were greased on occasion, but I do not believe that oiling was a regular thing. Else we would see many more examples of strike through IMO. Why does rust demand so much attention? Oz put it best. This is numismatic forensics. In turn we want to be able to explain how and why something occurs. A great example is die progression. Look at the thread PeaceVamJunkie just did on the 1924-P VAM-5a. AWESOME. Well same thing... how did the LDS occur... well it started with the EDS and progressed into a monster. Would an EDS fill the hole? yes, but that to me is not VAMing, it is collecting. VAMing is wanting to understand WHY.
Also it demands attention because of the wide range of theories as to again WHY it exists at all. GO PRIMERS! :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Quote: but that to me is not VAMing, it is collecting. VAMing is wanting to understand WHY. Oh Remmy, I like that very much. Pat is a smart guy, but your definition of vamming right there is something that I will never forget. I 'really' like that. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
Ultimately it is the identification of die pairs and their stages, but understanding how and why things happened to the die is how I define my personal VAMing experience.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
If that is your definition then, you must know the press, its capabilities and limitations. Without that knowledge, your personal experience will be dependent on the musings of others.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
In the end one must at a minimum try to understand the whole process.. The "die is the die" yet it is only one portion of the equation..As for new vammers. I don't mean to over quantify things...Its not really that bad..these many threads in these past few weeks have talked about SO MANY of the ins and outs.. or better said...questions of the whole of the process....As a beginner you may only think you have the coin in hand....but really there was a process that put it there.....these things we have talked about.. and some of the questions that are raised about the process, and how it works...I hope this will help in your understandings of these topics...as they are related..yet the separate threads ar but chapters of this study..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Quote: Its not really that bad Maybe it isn't that hard for you buddy, but I feel as though I have been thrashing about in the water not knowing how to swim. When you guys start talking about the late and early states of VAM 3Cl, I can actually feel my eyeballs roll back in my head (way back).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
AS you well know my friend when things get deep we need our hip waders to follow how deep it gets. and as Terry does well know soon we are looking for pimples to discern the exact VAM.. but that's not what we are really looking for here...we are hopeing that the most of us can grasp the beging's of vamming and not get lost into the details......or we are over come...when pimples become the subject.. then most of us just want to stop.. It doesn't pertain to our coins..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Gene, I copied this from your post on page 2 of this thread. It is probably something that I just will never be able to comprehend, but was hoping that you could take just one more stab at explaining it to me:
R-1 = Common (Tens of Millions) R-2 = Not so Common (Several Million) R-3 = Scarce (Hundreds of Thousands) R-4 = Very Scarce (Tens of Thousands) R-5 = Rare (Several Thousand) R-6 = Very Rare (Several Hundred) R-7 = Extremely Rare (Few Tens) R-8 = Unique or Nearly Unique (Several)
Okay, here is where I get lost: How long did a die last? How many coins could a particularly prolific die pair produce? Even at a survival rate of 100%, is R-3 realistic?
It would seem to me that R-1, R-2, and R-3 would be nonexistent, (as impossibilities)......which causes me to doubt the rest.......
Now I do understand that the ratings assigned to individual vams were just best guesses at time of discovery, but, if the basis for the entire theory is obviously impossible, then why build upon it?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
It's been my opinion that the numbers in parenthesis are different for every issue.
The average Morgan pieces struck per die pair are(strictly mathematical): Philly - 217,679; New Orleans - 151,208; San Fran - 121,930; Carson City - 62,441. With this in mind, I don't think that R-7 for a Philly coin and a Carson City coin should be the same number, much less making it a blanket statement regarding all Morgans at once.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Thanks for the clarification Dave.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
:)
Edited by remmy1100 09/20/2010 1:33 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Obviously ignorance on my part. Thanks both of you then. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
The only thing I would add (minus the wording).... just the R1-R8, is that it is an educated guess from Leroy which I believe the equation to be similar to this...
"I have seen this many similar to this one, so it must be about this rare". Nothing more than a guess at rarity from a human.
|
| |
Replies: 265 / Views: 17,279 |