1884-O VAM 10?

Cool . Thanks aladin!

I would venture a grade, IMO, This coin exhibits a GOOD Obverse strike, some rub spots in the commons areas, Head, Hair over the ear, I still see some remnants of original luster, although I believe the coin was cleaned at some time, obvious cleaning marks above and below the Lettering and around the relief areas.
The Reverse, I see as a better than good strike, some small rub spots in common areas, actually to shiny for the coin to be "natural", meaning I believe this is more of the cleaning residue we see, along with the same marks around the lettering, and the eagles head, over all this coin has some distracting marks, whether from just being dirty or from another ? source.
I see this coin still in pretty decent condition, I would grade, from these photos, this coin a EF-45+- AU+, Just my opinion.....

AL, I am asking you, don't you mean the "lack of tail feathers', I do see some but next to none on the legs and around them, The upper chest of the eagle presents barely any feathers.Also the dings at 7pm on the Obverse,the missing, or rubbed off hair over Anna's ear, the wear on the cap, the letter N from the word ONE on the Reverse is very beat-up and again, the overall appearance would IMO, never receive the grade of an MS Coin, maybe as stated before, AU+, JUST MY OPINION.......PS, Not to mention the coin was with out a doubt, from all observations, Cleaned....Not a $33.00 coin in MS60,Sept, NN Coin Market Price Guide, NOT...Compare a slabbed MS-60 Morgan to this coin, I believe you will see the difference I am speaking about...

OK.

The first 3 pics show "auras" of less-toned areas around the devices. The devices themselves are toned. These are characteristic of newer/artificial toning following a chemical cleaning. The third pic is particularly revealing; it speaks "AT" very loudly to me.

I'm not saying it's deliberate - one of the things we miss when pronouncing a coin AT vs. NT is that very few people "deliberately" tone their coins.

The date detail pic shows characteristic northwest-southeast scratch lines consistent with brushing, on the neck and field to its' left. The pic is too small a sample to decide with certainty, though.

One finds strongly-struck 1884-O Morgans. I believe this to be one of them, having circulated a little.