| Author |
 Replies: 531 / Views: 78,458 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1005 Posts |
Can anyone else see a relationship to near S and far S also known as date near rim and date far from rim and the new far 2?
My certified 1932 said "date near rim, 2 far from leaf" on the cccs holder. It was a "near S"
That in mind will a far S certify as "date far from rim 2 near leaf"
Are all near rim concave field far 2's?
I do not use the photos in Charlton for near and far S, they don't look right to me.
I have a 1936 near S and far S and the 6 is higher and lower.
Please see page 6 for date near rim (near S)
Please see page 4 for date far from rim (far S)
"S" near rim = date near rim
Edited by Bm0ney
01/08/2013 09:36 am
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10459 Posts |
Bm0ney, sounds like the beginning of a proper die study.... start hoarding and studying the 1932 5-cent pieces, to see if you can figure out how many matrixes or hubs were used to make the 1932 dies, as bosox suggested some time ago...
More importantly, publish your results.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1005 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1005 Posts |
All of the high 2 I have and have checked are far S's.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
402 Posts |
@ Coin Chick,
I wait your " final results ".
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1354 Posts |
Za75
I'll try to have them for you within next couple days.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts |
@ BmOney, Your say : " I do not use the photos in charlton for near and far S, they don't look right to me. " I agree with your comment and for my search ( result below ), I refer you to the following link : http://numicanada.com/forum/viewtop...776&start=60See, at the end of this page, the work of clownoses, 03/05/2010, 11:25 am. I have investigated carefully some clear photos of Far 2 : - 5 photos from numicanada.com - 3 photos from coincommunity - 8 photos from ebay. I have seen that all these coins Far 2 have the same three characteristics : 1- 2 near 3 2- 2 near rim 3- S regular* to rim. * = see ducument of clownoses. I wait your commentaries on this. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1005 Posts |
Good reference photos by clownnose for 1922 and 1936.
Unfortunately, I can not understand all the French words used.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1354 Posts |
za75
Looks like my final count is
Far 2
Near 85
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts |
Coin Chick, thank you very much 
With all new data from coincommunity and numicanada, the trend, for the 5 cents 1932 Far 2, is now :
32/3809= 0.84 %
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
686 Posts |
za75 - When you started this thread, your stats showed 18/1430 (1.26%) were Far 2s. Since that point, 14/2379 (0.59%) have been Far 2s.
If the 1430 were randomly sampled, the chances of the next 2379 randomly sampled having 14 (or less) Far 2s in the lot is less than 1 in 1000. Any idea why this is? Did anyone in the first 1400 have a significant number of these coins, or do you think that in the 2400 since then, there's been repeats?
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts |
jg86 - You say : ".... randomly sampleed... ". These data where send voluntarly by members of coincommunity and numicanada, these data are not my samples ! .... No idea why this is ! Maybe in one or two years more.
You say too : " ... do you think that in the 2400 since then, there's been repeats ? " Seriously, and I am serious in this thread, I don't think thus !
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts |
@ BmOmey,
Following my post, 01/10/2013 and your post, 01/10/2013 :
clownoses present ( see the link ) with photos, 03/05/2010, three position of the S of CENTS, in relation with the rim :
- Near Rim
- Regular ( normal ) with Rim
- Far Rim.
No need of english word with this : the photos are better than Charlton's photos.
SPP-Ottawa said, in his post 01/08/2013 : " BmOney, sounds like the beginning of proper die study.....".
I think that my post 01/10/2013 is a step in this direction, no ?
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts |
Hi jg86,
Please, send me an E-Mail : I have need to speak you about this variety.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
686 Posts |
za - pm sent, as mentioned, e-mail me at my gmail, not the one that it came from
|
| |
Replies: 531 / Views: 78,458 |
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 01/08/2013 09:54 am
