| Author |
Replies: 268 / Views: 29,021 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
310 Posts |
Forgot to post it yesterday but here' my lowball 1797 Large Cent  By [URL="http://profile.imageshack.us/user/null]null[/URL] at 2011-01-23  By [URL="http://profile.imageshack.us/user/null]null[/URL] at 2011-01-23
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Nice coins everyone! My next, 1800 ;-)
Any 1799's :-O
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4421 Posts |
Here's a 1799 S-189 that was once lacquered, and traces of lacquer remain. The date is not as strong as Liberty. Much hair detail appears, and the leaves evidence slight detail. The reverse die chip is absent, as I'm told it was an early die state. While there's no damage, no heavy circulation marks, surface unevenness suggests use of an inferior planchet. The color is mahogany, and there's no porosity. A few EACers have told me it's got VF-25 detail but will net grade VG-10 or F-12. All in all, it's a very respectable example of this rare date; and, a fun coin to own and discuss. My pics don't do justice to the coin's appearance. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4421 Posts |
Here's the reverse pic of my 1799. I had difficulty with the sizing ... Old age is apparently the issue here - mine, not the coin's! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
1800!!1800 Half Cent 1800 Large Cent 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1348 Posts |
This is a great forum! I can see myself here everyday for the next couple months
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Moe, nice 3 errors reverse 1801 
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
1802 Large Cent 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
Quote: Moe, nice 3 errors reverse 1801 Man, I wish! It would more than triple the value of this coin!  But, this coin only has the one error: 1/000. (The other two errors would be a missing stem to the left of the ribbon tie and the "U" in UNITED to be like "II", both on the reverse. See the picture from the PCGS Grading Guide Web Site. Unfortunately, my coin doesn't have those two errors).  I still like it though! 
Edited by Moe145 01/27/2011 5:06 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
310 Posts |
It kind of amazes me the amount of errors and variations in early American coinage. I guess it goes to show you that the early mint was really just a handful of people trying to make currency that would live up to the standards of the rest of the world.
By the bust style days I think they started to really get things together, but it did take them like 7-8 years of trial and error. I kinda wish they would have stayed with the flowing hair style a bit longer. I think they are really good looking coins(when they had a decent planchet and struck them well).
The early silver and gold seem to have aged better, but a nice early copper is beautiful.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
573 Posts |
Even though you can't read the date, I did the research and figured out this is an 1802 S231 - stemless. It's the oldest US coin that I own, given to me by my great uncle over 30 years ago. He also gave me another one but it's completely smooth on the obverse with a hint of a wreath on the reverse. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Yeah, your right. Still a very cool coin!
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 268 / Views: 29,021 |