| Author |
Replies: 28 / Views: 3,428 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
Nice looking coin. I agree with AU-58. I also agree with Jaobler on the old cleaning. Don't know much about PCGS I'm an NGC man myself.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Oh, and for the record, I agree with AU55.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I'm not a bust half guy, but I would think that it would grade at least AU-58. That would be an awesome 7070 coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
mshev! I know you're new but the coins you have posted are INCREDIBLE (Including the MS SLQs in the "14 Days of SLQS")!! Man, you are  x 1,000!! and  x 1,000 too! 
|
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
Quote: O-111? That has my vote!  Obverse: Stars 1 & 2 are closer than the other stars, Reverse: I centered under the right side of the T, the letters of STATES are all at different levels = O-111 for me.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
312 Posts |
Thanks again guys - and for pointing out the variety. What's a good site online for that? I found one for Morgans but not other coins.
Moe - Thanks! The SLQs are a couple of my favs - the toned MS-64 was one of my first bigger purchases. I'm going to upload a few more coins to my "Hello from DC" post :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1691 Posts |
Best first post by a newbie... CONGRATS!
Edited by atlashealth 03/26/2011 4:31 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
266 Posts |
Glad to see my grading skills improving. I thoughts AU-58 when I first saw it and was confirmed by several knowledgeable forum members. Great coin! I hope it avoids getting the cleaned tag though.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
312 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
312 Posts |
Well, after having more time to look the coin over, and then confirm my concerns (the old cleaning) with a couple bust experts at the coin show, I've decided to send this one back :( As you can see from the top 2 close-up pics, there seem to be some hairlines - the cleaning was a bit more thorough than a dipping. Well, now I'm back on the look-out for a nicely toned bust half!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
244 Posts |
My advice is don't send it back unless you paid premium dollar for it. The reality is that there are very few attractive-looking bust halves that aren't cleaned. And from what I've seen, cleaning doesn't have the same hit on the value of these as it does on most other coins.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
312 Posts |
Wei - I agree that many attractive bust halves have been cleaned, however the reverse of this one has some areas that look a bit too harshly cleaned (reflective spots - where the hairlines are most noticeable). Everyone I've shown the coin to in person agrees that the coin will have a veryy low chance at slabbing. The price I paid for it would have been fine for a coin dipped awhile ago, but this was a bit too extensive.
|
| |
Replies: 28 / Views: 3,428 |