| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,001 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2346 Posts |
This was sent in via bulk submission to PCGS through Variety Slabbing Service (VSS) and attributed by John (Messy Desk) Baumgart. Bonus for easy VAMI'm not a fan of toning...but I really like the obverse color. Will post grade Monday evening. smat     |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1143 Posts |
I'm more in the low end 63 area.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18741 Posts |
obv MS64 rev MS63
i think the reverse will hold it back so MS63
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1799 Posts |
MS-63, rare case where the reverse brings the grade down.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2346 Posts |
Nobody tried for the bonus VAM...that's ok...these can be a little tricky. Here we go...   I think she's pretty delicious! smat |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6399 Posts |
Grade seems generous. I was at 63, based on contact marks, obverse fingerprint, rim hit by B of LIBERTY, and so-so luster. Don't know if VAM 2A is particularly desirable but the doubling is pretty minor. Glad you like it, though! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
I thought for sure the reverse would hold that one to a 64. Congrats, you did well on it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18741 Posts |
i think the lighting and shadowing are the reasons for the CCF grades. as for the fingerprint, I have seen quite a few slabbed coins with fingerprints and it did not seem to have any effect on the grade. not sure why TPG's ignore them since collectors poo-poo them and we always call them out. Anyone else notice this? for me there are just to many marks/scuffs on both sides to make 65 |
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,001 |
|
Posted 08/20/2022 1:23 pm
