| Author |
Replies: 33 / Views: 6,863 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
216 Posts |
The law prohibits the depiction of any living women on the upcoming quarters.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3642 Posts |
It would be interesting if one of the designs featured Martha Washington. The portrait from the 1886 Silver Certificate (Fr. #217) could boost collector attention.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95740 Posts |
Quote:Technically EVERY State and ATB Quarter has been a "one year only" type. Never really thought of them like that. but they are part of a series unlike the CTD quarter..
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Quote:Technically EVERY State and ATB Quarter has been a "one year only" type. True, but the CTD quarter was not supposed to be one. Quote: I can't help but wonder if they will try and slip a living woman in on one of the designs. The legislation does not forbid it. Quote: The law prohibits the depiction of any living women on the upcoming quarters. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7190 Posts |
So... were going to have two headed quarters?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
561 Posts |
I think it would be way better if they kicked out Washington and used profiles of the women they plan to commemorate in place of Washington with a consistent reverse or a reverse related to their work, sort of like the innovation dollar reverses. I think the current portraits on our coinage have run their course and then some
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Quote: So... were going to have two headed quarters?  Quote: I think it would be way better if they kicked out Washington and used profiles of the women they plan to commemorate in place of Washington with a consistent reverse or a reverse related to their work, sort of like the innovation dollar reverses. I think the current portraits on our coinage have run their course and then some I agree. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
216 Posts |
I totally agree with using new obverse portraits. Here is how long the original (or very slightly modified) obverses have been used on our current coins:
Cent - Lincoln - 1909 (112 years - before we were all born) Nickel - Jefferson - 2006 (portrait changed from side to frontal view) Dime - Roosevelt - 1946 (75 years - no change) Quarter - Washington - 1932 (89 years - minor size changes to original portrait) Half - Kennedy - 1964 (57 years - no changes)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
84 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1373 Posts |
Quote: Cent - Lincoln - 1909 (112 years - before we were all born) Speak for yourself, Hidalgo! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: The law prohibits the depiction of any living women on the upcoming quarters. The authorizing legislation doesn't, and there is no overall law that forbids living people on the coinage. So legally is IS a possibility. However most people THINK there is a law forbidding it, so most likely such a design would not get past the CCAC or the Fine Arts Commission.
|
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
Is it possible that the Mint will make a silver version of the WCtD just like they did with the 1976 ones? Obviously not business strikes, but I'm kinda hoping it won't just be proof versions. Kinda like the silver Ike dollars with both uncirculated and proof strikes.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
216 Posts |
@Conder. The text of H.R.1923 - Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020 contains the following requirement: "(1) PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN REPRESENTATIONS.—No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of any coin under subsections (x), (y), and (z). Subsections (x), (y), and (z) reference: (x) Redesign And Issuance Of Quarter Dollars Emblematic Of Prominent American Women And Commemorating The 19th Amendment.— (y) Redesign And Issuance Of Coins Emblematic Of The United States Semiquincentennial.— (z) Redesign And Issuance Of Quarter Dollars And Half Dollars Emblematic Of Sports Played By American Youth.— Here's the text of the law: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th...ll/1923/text
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10034 Posts |
So I wonder if this plan of changing designs with every moon phase really brings in that much extra money?
I know when the states series started it seemed EVERYONE wanted to collect them even...numismatist or not.
After the states issues I never saw or heard of many people wanting the rest of them like they did the initial states designs. Granted, if the mint went back to same design for OBV and REV, then there would be only one silver quarter per silver proof set sold etc. I just have to wonder how much they really make doing this? Obviously enough to continue.
I lost interest after the states (and even halfway through!) Unlike years ago when we could find silver in pocket change, everything clad (except the W quarters and other special issues like this) lose their value over time, this was enough for me to lose interest. So this new series will continue to be ho hum for me. I am sure there are others who will enjoy them.
As far as getting rid of Washington, reminders of our roots are fast becoming rare, and that is never good. But the design, like the others, has ben around for a very long time now.
I would love to see a return to a traditional Liberty design like the old classics, but the mint would have to hire better talented artists. I say revive quality such as Gasparro and Weinmann made. Although this level of achievement seems beyond the ken/abilities of modern coin artists?
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
216 Posts |
@Earle42 -
Going back to the same OBV and REV quarter designs ain't gonna happen for several years. The 2020 coinage law gives the US Mint to create collector products with different metals, finishes, privies, packaging, etc. -- all at a profit.
Returning back to the classic designs from generations ago likely will not happen for circulating coins -- unless portrayals of Lady Liberty are politically correct (racially, ethnically, etc.).
Personally, I like seeing the changes. There's no need to collect/buy every coin that is minted. Collect/buy what you like. You'll be happier that way (smile).
============================================
Granted, if the mint went back to same design for OBV and REV, then there would be only one silver quarter per silver proof set sold etc. I just have to wonder how much they really make doing this? Obviously enough to continue.
I lost interest after the states (and even halfway through!) Unlike years ago when we could find silver in pocket change, everything clad (except the W quarters and other special issues like this) lose their value over time, this was enough for me to lose interest. So this new series will continue to be ho hum for me. I am sure there are others who will enjoy them.
I would love to see a return to a traditional Liberty design like the old classics, but the mint would have to hire better talented artists. I say revive quality such as Gasparro and Weinmann made. Although this level of achievement seems beyond the ken/abilities of modern coin artists?
|
| |
Replies: 33 / Views: 6,863 |