Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1988 D LMC RDV-006? Need Help With This FG

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 795Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
150 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2023  4:50 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add 2foxy to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I found this 1988 D LMC that might be RDV-006 as the FG looks exactly like one that I have that is a 1989. I need expert confirmation. Thanks so much for your help :)
1988-D-LMC-RDV-006?-Need-Help-With-This-FG
1988-D-LMC-RDV-006?-Need-Help-With-This-FG
1988-D-LMC-RDV-006?-Need-Help-With-This-FG
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8842 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2023  4:56 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That is the normal reverse for an 88, not what you are looking for.
-makecents-
Valued Member
Learn More...
Cointree's Avatar
United States
450 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2023  4:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Cointree to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That looks to me like RDV-005 and not RDV-006. 005 is the one you would expect for 1988 so nothing rare here.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Cujohn's Avatar
United States
7174 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2023  7:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Cujohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
a regular 88.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
98963 Posts
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8842 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2023  8:29 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I'm still confused about all these rdv's on the 88
I understand, to some extent, there are certain varieties and errors that still mess with me, but this is not one of them. What don't you get about it?
-makecents-
Edited by -makecents-
04/07/2023 8:31 pm
Valued Member
United States
150 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2023  9:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 2foxy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is what confuses me, I have a 1989 that looks nearly identical to this one. At first I thought that I might have a 1989 with an RDV-005 reverse.
1988-D-LMC-RDV-006?-Need-Help-With-This-FG
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8842 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2023  11:49 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Both have bad zincoln issues. That, in itself is an issue and makes it hard to make a call on it. In my opinion, the pics you have here, are labeled correctly for the reverse that is normal for each of them. I have come to the conclusion, after looking at several thousand of the 88's, if you have to look at it for more than 2 seconds, and question it, it is not the transitional variety you are looking for and I toss it.
-makecents-
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5240 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2023  06:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know that I would toss it just yet. If you wanted to, for a couple of bucks you can have it attributed. There might be something to this Cent. The M looks heavier than the M on the RDV-005. But the again it could be just the lighting from the pics. Interesting Cent.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2023  1:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If there is die wear on the strike, it is not a RDV-006. These were used for a short time and didn't get worn to look like that. If you check the AME on On America, you will see that these devices are rounded (RDV-005) and the RDV-006 show wider devices on that area.
1988-D-LMC-RDV-006?-Need-Help-With-This-FG
This area will answer the question for sure. Rounded devices, RDV-005.
Bedrock of the Community
merclover's Avatar
United States
10635 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2023  1:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add merclover to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Please no screen shots. They are too pixelated to be of use.
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 795Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums