| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 10,105 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1028 Posts |
It's extremely worn, I agree it would grade 1/70. Even at this level of wear the recessed date quarters will show some semblance of a date. So the coin is 1917-1924. There are some diagnostics to determine certain dates within that range, but it's usually even more difficult than separating a 1916 from a 1917 and there is absolutely no way anyone could do it with this amount of wear. It's usually only possible on those few SLQs from 17-24, that are VG or even F details, but despite that have completely lost their date. I'm not sure if I've ever seen a VF with the date completely gone
edit...to say that I've seen G-4 dateless SLQs have a numismatic premium and sometimes type1 coins in worse condition, but this coin would only sell for spot. Which is actually a premium if you think about it because at this level of wear it's lost quite a bit of silver content. It's worth about $5.50 currently
Edited by hesgut 10/20/2011 6:21 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
564 Posts |
I don't think you can grade a coin that has no date and no way to determine it's date. It's worth it's silver value only. I honestly would not pay spot for it. To me it has no collector value.
|
|
New Member
United States
18 Posts |
Looks like I can barely make out a "1927" date, mostly the final "7". Is it just me being delusional, or what?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
564 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
393 Posts |
The example on PCGSPhotograde that is graded PO01 is very slightly better than this one.
|
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
With no date, it is a no grade. To be a PR-01 it must be identifiable as to variety and date. Many of the early large cents could be indentified by the variety without a visible date. With no date this piece can't be identified.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
Sweet coin tho think of how many pockets it's been in and out of. Thanks for sharin
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I'm not sure but I think you can bring up the date on this with vinegar and or hydrogen peroxide . Still would not be much more than melt.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8517 Posts |
A 1916 slq can be identified without a date. Show us a pic.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8517 Posts |
...and don't do vinegar/peroxide.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
Quote:I have a true dateless 1916 Standing Liberty quarter that I just inherited. Where is the best place to have it graded? Thank you. I suppose that either NGC or PCGS would grade it, but my gut tells me NGC. It's been my experience that they are better at attributing varieties than PCGS. Revised to say that I just checked "Coin Facts" the PCGS information center. They have pictures of dateless 1916 Standing Liberty quarters in FR-02 with no dates showing. The trick is to look at the design of lower bottom folds of the gown on the left side. I don't have a photographic image of it in my memeory, but there are photos out there of the proper shapes. BTW there is no way that this piece is a 1916, It is a Type II or III with three stars under the eagle on the reverse.
Edited by billjones 03/23/2016 10:52 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8517 Posts |
Bill you're responding to two different people. This thread was started in 2011 and Jamestaylor just reopened it with his 1916 question.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
Why didn't he start a new thread? If he is able to post a picture of his 1916 Standing Liberty quarter, he should do that.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8517 Posts |
He was probably Googling about his coin and this thread came up. Happens a lot. Hopefully he hangs around.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 10,105 |
Page 2 of 2
|