| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 4,136 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3640 Posts |
Looks to be a 1964. Is that correct ? I truly believe that this is a mint error and not PMD. Still trying to figure out exactly what and how on it though. Looks Unc. also with plenty of luster on it. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
Any chance that is a silver panchet for a dime?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
461 Posts |
This coin is acid treated. A very typical example. This type of so called error shows up on these forums many, many times......actually way too many times for me. Please don't waste your time and effort trying to figure out what this is. Take my advice and that of a few posters prior to mine. Also, if you want to see more examples of this acid treated type, just search the word "acid" in this forum or other coin forums and you will see tons of posts on this post mint damage type.
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
I think if you saw the actual coin you would not think it was acid dipped. There was enough metal in the center of the Planchet for Jefferson's head to stamp out fairly well and most of the detail is there on his face and hair and yes it does have good luster to it. I can tell it is a 1964 D. I've had the coin since 1964 or early 1965 and I know the history of the coin, I am very certain it was not created and I am certain in came out of an uncirculated roll unless the lady that gave it to me was not telling me the truth and she had nothing to gain by making up such a story. Wish I had a scale to weigh it, it definatly is not silver.
Thanks for all your opinions
Dave
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
It's an acid dipped coin. The pock marks on the surface scream that out. The missing rims. All classic for an acid dipped coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
If it is not silver then I cannot imagine how it could have become like that from a minting process. Something had to have happened outside of the mint in that case, IMHO.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
Dave:
Look at your coin at or near the 1 o'clock position (obverse). The edge of the coin is thicker here than anywhere else and looks to me to have a piece of the original rim. I think it was held here by tweezers to dip it in acid. A dime planchet struck by a nickle die would not produce a partial rim at that point.
This is just my opinion and I am open to any explanation as to how it happened.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I don't think that this coin has been acid treated.
I'll betcha London to a brick on
that this coin weighs considerably less than a normal nickel.
It certainly looks like a split planchet error to me.
Basically, the planchet was laminated, usually caused by a patch of impurities in the strip when it was rolled.
The coin has fallen apart AFTER it was struck.
I have a couple of split planchet errors in my collection.
Edited by sel_69l
03/18/2013 7:27 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15543 Posts |
Great ... lots of opinions and expert views ... it is what we do best here at the CCF.
To me ... the coin appears to be acid treated ... but I could be very wrong and hope the OP forms their own views based on the collective CCF input.
David
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
Should we ping Mike Diamond?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
808 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
461 Posts |
You don't need to waste Mike Diamond's time. The coin is acid treated. You don't have to be an expert to know this. This is such a classic example it's almost ridiculous to think that many still can't recognize this post mint error type. For those that still don't believe or don't want to believe, don't be surprised when a credible party like Mike Diamond confirms it. Whew!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2740 Posts |
As many others have already stated, this is an "acid job". The coin shows a uniformly mushy design on both faces, is perfectly centered, has lost the design rim, and is undersized and underweight. All are classic diagnostic features of this common alteration.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
Thanks to you all for the answer to a coin I for many years thought really amounted to something. You all, I am sure are correct, thank you all for your time.
Dave
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote:
It certainly looks like a split planchet error to me.
Basically, the planchet was laminated, usually caused by a patch of impurities in the strip when it was rolled.
The coin has fallen apart AFTER it was struck. In which case it would look perfectly normal on one side with full rims, unless you are suggesting that both obv and reverse laminated and split off after striking leaving a central core piece? Even then you would have a problem in that it would have to be the full diameter and show complete legends, and not have the legends all the way out to the edge of the coin. No it is not a split planchet. The OP is an acid soaked piece. Sorry posted before I saw the Mike had weighed in. Edited by Conder101
03/19/2013 1:56 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 4,136 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/17/2013 8:53 pm
