| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,046 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1054 Posts |
I just love mint state seated material from the civil war era. I would have to say 64 is appropriate for this example, even with the light hairlines. Very attractive coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1959 Posts |
Put me at 63 for the lines. Very difficult to grade the high AU-MS COINS even with good pics. In hand coins always look different.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
285 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Proof? Rims kind of look proofish to me and nice frosting, I'll say PR64 - looks like it's close but not quite to cameo, the reverse is only half frosted.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440Edited by westcoin
05/06/2013 9:10 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I will go with MS-63. MS-64 is possible but the weakness in the rock and top left of the wreath may hold it back. Great coin!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4337 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6390 Posts |
The MS-60 grade apparently takes the numerous hairlines into account and the reverse strike weakness would not have been seen as a positive attribute. On a re-submit you might squeak out another point, maybe two. Or, you might get an MS details grade with a judgment of cleaning or altered surface. With just a $90 value difference between MS-60 and MS-63 (per the PCGS price guide) I don't think a resubmit would be worthwhile.
Nevertheless, the coin definitely has superior eye appeal for the assigned grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
I was grading from iPhone screen, but I still think it looks way nicer than a 60 grade, really thought it might be a proof though.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It looks better than a 60, which is a grade rarely used these days.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1795 Posts |
No excuses for me...I will stay with 64 ...have seen MS66 that didn't look as clear and sharp as that! What that shows me is that grading 20 years ago was stricter than it is now and is very subjective. As they say Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Oh yes I would at least get it re-holdered or use some slab-renew to make it clear again because you have a very nice coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
You my friend BH1964 are 100% correct in my opinion, I think the grading system needs a little changing, especially for toned coins, I love them but I think they should get an environmental grade if a coin is toned, also should there not be a set magnification for reviewing a coin, for cleaned or not, for anything I think should be max 5%, seems a lot of coins are coing back with details/cleaned grades
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
I think they missed the mark on this one but if you only picked up an additional 2 pts, its probably not worth it. place it in your collection and enjoy it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
A forum question - How did you change the thread's title after revealing the grade?
I've tried that once but it didn't allow me to.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
Nice dime!
...and it seems that more than one person is claiming it be theirs in the PCGS Registry;
This cert is currently in a user's Set Registry inventory and is featured in one or more sets, including LDGIII.
Edited by oih82w8
05/09/2013 12:06 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
HA! I own it! Its in my possession! I am going to see this for myself
**EDIT**
I called PCGS and the coin can only be registered to one set and it is mine, thank goodness!
Now I learned that ALL 1862-P LSD have the designation #4635 and if you see that across multiple sets now I get what you're saying. But if you click that hyperlink in any given set you wind up seeing the actual cert number for that coin.
Edited by dsfreeworld
05/09/2013 1:37 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,046 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/06/2013 7:54 pm
