You Vs. PCGS 1893-CC

I don't see a reverse photo.

Obverse looks 64+.

the photo I provided was of a PCGS MS-65PL, pedigree Jack Lee.
This same coin is up for sale in Vegas next week in a PCGS MS-66 holder (note the PL has been dropped). Still pedigreed to Jack Lee. I'm wondering if this chicanery (dropping the PL) is meant to fool buyers into thinking this coin was a 66 all along. It's a great coin- but is it a 66 out of getting it right or out of greed on the part of the seller? My guess is that this coin sells for $150K and then gets sent in again to regain the PL.

I knew this was a 65, but I was going to say 66, but I believe there is too much of a gap between MS64, and MS65, there are so many 64s with bag marks and then you get this coin which I think with just going off the obverse should be a 66 min.

also a VAM 2, I think.

Yes, it is a Top Pop piece now. Here's the CoinFacts image:

With the images provided by BH, I agree with MS-66.

don't you think its weird though that it lost the PL. The coin doesn't look like a borderline example to me. I wonder if it lost the PL so that high end Morgan folks might not recognize the coin- and not realize it upgraded a point.