| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,748 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1844 Posts |
lots of wear on his beard and cheek but nice clear fields and lots of luster.  I will take a stab at MS 62 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3049 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9868 Posts |
Not well struck, well struck examples are plentiful, I'd give it MS62.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
Admittedly it's a weak strike, especially at the center of the canoe as mentioned above but ICCS does not seem to take strike into account, ever. As I have learned (albeit slowly) ICCS weighs heavy on the fields.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1046 Posts |
it`s a great
example(imo)
thank you
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1049 Posts |
nice coin Paul, I'm gonna go out on the limb............MS65. How did you do with the Arnprior? Ready for me to get it yet lol?
Jon
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
972 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Very good looking coin. I myself give it a 64 but ICCS may have gone down to 63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
Here you go...  Edited by TheCoinHunter
04/05/2014 10:10 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
Again, I'm late to the party, but I would have said ms65.
I don't agree with ICCS on this one.
Especially for 1935, for an ms66, fields have to be extremely mark-free and I see a few marks more compatible to an ms65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
867 Posts |
I had said MS64, but perhaps the lighting/camera exaggerates the marks and flaws on the coin....I'm sure it's a stunner in person.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,748 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 04/04/2014 3:20 pm
