| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,068 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
EF-45, old cleaning, very light though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
XF-40 due to the old cleaning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
XF-45 to AU50 grade wise This is an excellent specimen of a tough Seated quarter Germanicvs, thanks for sharing. -MV |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
Nice key date. I agree with MeadowviewCollector on the grade, either XF-45 or AU-50. Lightly cleaned long ago but I don't think that will stop it getting a problem free grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1096 Posts |
I think obverse looks 45 and reverse looks 55, I'll say AU 50. Nice coin
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
Razor sharp detail but cleaned. AU-55 details
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
EF+ old cleaning still nice coin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
I'd venture EF45+ with a very light old cleaning. John Ford Jr. once said he only considered a coin cleaned if it looked cleaned anything else is conservation, I tend to agree with him, the potential old cleaning really doesn't apply on coins like this one.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
AU details/cleaned.
Sharp coin still!
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Germany
1852 Posts |
It just occurred to me that I never thanked you guys for your opinions about this coin. So thanks, all!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
It is ex Norweb Sale 1988. They had two specimens of this date/mm. This one was described in the catalogue as EF40. I would hope you have the auction documentation that shows it's provenance from the Norweb sale, was it from Norweb's collection directly, or just an add in consignment? Do you know? I wonder if you could get this in a TPG slab with a label stating Ex-Norweb that alone would surely add value to the coin's value. Though from all the cool coins you've posted over the past year or so, I'd venture that a label that states Ex-GERMANICVS Coll. would also be pretty cool  , there are a few Federal era coins you've posted I'd surely love to have in my collection.  "Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18712 Posts |
I agree with fayette1800. XF45 OBV. AU55 REV. net it at AU50. If it was cleaned it was a while ago and was not done maliciously. Looks perfectly market acceptable. Another winner
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1536 Posts |
AU50, market acceptable surfaces. Looks like a nice coin to me.
Edited by buddy16cat
02/01/2015 05:44 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
1852 Posts |
Quote westcoin": I would hope you have the auction documentation that shows it's provenance from the Norweb sale, was it from Norweb's collection directly, or just an add in consignment? Do you know? I wonder if you could get this in a TPG slab with a label stating Ex-Norweb that alone would surely add value to the coin's value." westcoin's comment got me thinking, so I retrieved Norweb sale catalogue this coin came from. This was lot 1610 from that sale, which I imagine was actual part of the Norweb holdings - If otherwise, I would think Bowers would have indicated as much. Also, no mention in the catalogue of other holdings being jointly sold in the sale. In any case, it was just a minor coin in that incredible sale - but I was happy to get it, and at a very affordable price too ($160 + commission). (the stains visible in the picture turned out to be just surface deposits which came off easily - I guess they were part of the provenance too!)   |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,068 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 01/21/2015 7:32 pm
